Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22962586›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular events in diabetic men: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Tomohide Yamada, Kazuo Hara, Hitomi Umematsu, Ryo Suzuki, Takashi Kadowaki

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Obesity and Sexual Functioning.Current obesity reports · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Erectile dysfunction.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2016
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomohide YamadaDepartment of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuo Hara
Hitomi Umematsu
Ryo Suzuki
Takashi Kadowaki
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have shown that erectile dysfunction (ED) influences the risk of cardiovascular events (CV events). However, a meta-analysis of the overall risk of CV events associated with ED in patients with diabetes has not been performed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for pertinent articles (including references) published between 1951 and April 22, 2012. English language reports of original observational cohort studies and cross-sectional studies were included. Pooled effect estimates were obtained by random effects meta-analysis. A total of 3,791 CV events were reported in 3 cohort studies and 9 cross-sectional studies (covering 22,586 subjects). Across the cohort studies, the overall odds ratio (OR) of diabetic men with ED versus those without ED was 1.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.27; P<0.001) for CV events and 1.72 (95% CI: 1.5-1.98; P<0.001) for coronary heart disease (CHD). The funnel plot, Begg's test, and Egger's test did not show evidence of publication bias (all P>0.05). Moreover, meta-regression analysis found no relationship between the method used to assess ED (questionnaire or interview), mean age, mean hemoglobin A(1c), mean body mass index, or mean duration of diabetes and the risk of CV events or CHD. In the cross-sectional studies, the OR of diabetic men with ED versus those without ED was 3.39 (95% CI: 2.58-4.44; P<0.001) for CV events (N = 9), 3.43 (95% CI: 2.46-4.77; P<0.001) for CHD (N = 7), and 2.63 (95% CI: 1.41-4.91; P = 0.002) for peripheral vascular disease (N = 5). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: ED was associated with an increased risk of CV events in diabetic patients. Prevention and early detection of cardiovascular disease are important in the management of diabetes, especially in view of the rapid increase in its prevalence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, BibliographicDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrevalenceRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22962586
PMCPMC3433443
OpenAlexW1976292063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.