Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22962584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.

Gemma N Jones, Dafni Moschidou, Tamara-Isabel Puga-Iglesias, Katarzyna Kuleszewicz, Maximilien Vanleene, Sandra J Shefelbine, George Bou-Gharios, Nicholas M Fisk, Anna L David, Paolo De Coppi and 1 more

Expression of concernOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neural crest-like stem cells for tissue regeneration.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gemma N JonesInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dafni Moschidou
Tamara-Isabel Puga-Iglesias
Katarzyna Kuleszewicz
Maximilien Vanleene
Sandra J Shefelbine
George Bou-Gharios
Nicholas M Fisk
Anna L David
Paolo De Coppi
Pascale V Guillot
Imperial College London · GBCell and Gene Therapy Catapult · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) isolated from fetal tissues hold promise for use in tissue engineering applications and cell-based therapies, but their collection is restricted ethically and technically. In contrast, the placenta is a potential source of readily-obtainable stem cells throughout pregnancy. In fetal tissues, early gestational stem cells are known to have advantageous characteristics over neonatal and adult stem cells. Accordingly, we investigated whether early fetal placental chorionic stem cells (e-CSC) were physiologically superior to their late gestation fetal chorionic counterparts (l-CSC). We showed that e-CSC shared a common phenotype with l-CSC, differentiating down the osteogenic, adipogenic and neurogenic pathways, and containing a subset of cells endogenously expressing NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC, and KLF4, as well as an array of genes expressed in pluripotent stem cells and primordial germ cells, including CD24, NANOG, SSEA4, SSEA3, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, STELLA, FRAGILIS, NANOS3, DAZL and SSEA1. However, we showed that e-CSC have characteristics of an earlier state of stemness compared to l-CSC, such as smaller size, faster kinetics, uniquely expressing OCT4A variant 1 and showing higher levels of expression of NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC and KLF4 than l-CSC. Furthermore e-CSC, but not l-CSC, formed embryoid bodies containing cells from the three germ layer lineages. Finally, we showed that e-CSC demonstrate higher tissue repair in vivo; when transplanted in the osteogenesis imperfecta mice, e-CSC, but not l-CSC increased bone quality and plasticity; and when applied to a skin wound, e-CSC, but not l-CSC, accelerated healing compared to controls. Our results provide insight into the ontogeny of the stemness phenotype during fetal development and suggest that the more primitive characteristics of early compared to late gestation fetal chorionic stem cells may be translationally advantageous.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationChorionFemaleFetal Stem CellsHumansKruppel-Like Factor 4Mesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, TransgenicPlacentaPluripotent Stem CellsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstBiomarkersKLF4 protein, humanKlf4 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Factor 4Stage-Specific Embryonic Antigens

Identifiers

PMID22962584
PMCPMC3433473
OpenAlexW2153643422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.