Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22962460›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

Inferring duplications, losses, transfers and incomplete lineage sorting with nonbinary species trees.

Maureen Stolzer, Han Lai, Minli Xu, Deepa Sathaye, Benjamin Vernot, Dannie Durand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Sketch, capture and layout phylogenies.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Convergent evolution ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maureen StolzerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. mstolzer@andrew.cmu.edu
Han Lai
Minli Xu
Deepa Sathaye
Benjamin Vernot
Dannie Durand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGene duplication (D), transfer (T), loss (L) and incomplete lineage sorting (I) are crucial to the evolution of gene families and the emergence of novel functions. The history of these events can be inferred via comparison of gene and species trees, a process called reconciliation, yet current reconciliation algorithms model only a subset of these evolutionary processes.

resultsWe present an algorithm to reconcile a binary gene tree with a nonbinary species tree under a DTLI parsimony criterion. This is the first reconciliation algorithm to capture all four evolutionary processes driving tree incongruence and the first to reconcile non-binary species trees with a transfer model. Our algorithm infers all optimal solutions and reports complete, temporally feasible event histories, giving the gene and species lineages in which each event occurred. It is fixed-parameter tractable, with polytime complexity when the maximum species outdegree is fixed. Application of our algorithms to prokaryotic and eukaryotic data show that use of an incomplete event model has substantial impact on the events inferred and resulting biological conclusions. AVAILABILITY: Our algorithms have been implemented in Notung, a freely available phylogenetic reconciliation software package, available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~durand/Notung. CONTACT: mstolzer@andrew.cmu.edu.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEvolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyGene DuplicationGene Transfer, HorizontalModels, GeneticPhylogenySoftware

Identifiers

PMID22962460
PMCPMC3436813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.