Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22962406›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2012

Interpretation of single and serial measures of HE4 and CA125 in asymptomatic women at high risk for ovarian cancer.

Nicole Urban, Jason Thorpe, Beth Y Karlan, Martin W McIntosh, Melanie R Palomares, Mary B Daly, Pamela Paley, Charles W Drescher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of CA125 and HE4 serum markers to predict ovarian cancer in elevated-risk women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  2. HE4: a potential diagnostic biomarker in autoimmune diseases.Central-European journal of immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole UrbanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, M2-B230, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. nurban@fhcrc.org.
Jason Thorpe
Beth Y Karlan
Martin W McIntosh
Melanie R Palomares
Mary B Daly
Pamela Paley
Charles W Drescher
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USCancer Research Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCity of Hope · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Fred Hutchinson Breast Cancer Clinical Validation CenterU01CA152637 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Christopher I Li, Savannah Corrina Partridge · 2010 to 2026
$14.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is approved for clinical use with CA125 to predict epithelial ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass or in remission after chemotherapy. Previously reported reference ranges for HE4 are inconsistent.

methodsWe report positivity thresholds yielding 90%, 95%, 98%, and 99% specificity for age-defined populations of healthy women for HE4, CA125, and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), a weighted average of HE4 and CA125. HE4 and CA125 were measured in 1,780 samples from 778 healthy women aged >25 years with a documented deleterious mutation, or aged >35 years with a significant family history. Effects on marker levels of a woman's age, ethnicity, and epidemiologic characteristics were estimated, as were the population-specific means, variances, and within- and between-woman variances used to generate longitudinal screening algorithms for these markers.

resultsCA125 levels were lower with Black ethnicity (P = 0.008). Smoking was associated with higher HE4 (P = 0.007) and ROMA (P < 0.019). Continuous oral contraceptive use decreased levels of CA125 (P = 0.041), and ROMA (P = 0.12). CA125 was lower in women age ≥55, and HE4 increased with age (P < 0.01), particularly among women age ≥55.

conclusionsBecause of the strong effect of age on HE4, thresholds for HE4 are best defined for women of specific ages. Age-specific population thresholds for HE4 for 95% specificity ranged from 41.4 pmol/L for women age 30 to 82.1 pmol/L for women age 80. IMPACT: Incorporation of serial marker values from screening history reduces personalized thresholds for CA125 and HE4 but is inappropriate for ROMA.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAlgorithmsCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsProteinsRisk FactorsWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2CA-125 AntigenProteinsWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22962406
PMCPMC3493821
OpenAlexW2153190986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.