Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22961501›Full record

ReviewIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2013

Biological characterizations of [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles as fullerene derivatives for cancer therapy.

Jie Meng, Xingjie Liang, Xiaoyuan Chen, Yuliang Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structure and Vibrational Spectroscopy of CMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanocomplex of Berberine with CMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Effects of Aqueous Dispersions of CInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie MengChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing 100190, China.
Xingjie Liang
Xiaoyuan Chen
Yuliang Zhao

Funding

Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and NanomedicineZIAEB000073 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI CHEN, XIAOYUAN · 2010 to 2020
$32.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EB999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EB000073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant tumor disease is one of the leading causes of human death in many countries. Currently, chemotherapy is considered highly efficient for cancer treatment. However, the clinical application of conventional chemotherapeutic agents is limited because of their high toxicity. With the development of nanotechnology, engineered nanomaterials have been widely and increasingly used in biomedical fields such as biomedicine. Thus, the use of engineered nanomaterials has become a promising approach to cancer treatment. Many newly fabricated nanomaterials with unique characteristics exhibit favorable therapeutic and diagnostic properties, implying their enormous potential as biomedical candidates. [Gd@C(82)(OH)(22)](n) is a new type of metallofullerenol nanoparticle with high anti-tumor activity but low toxicity. In this article, the properties and biological effects of [Gd@C(82)(OH)(22)](n) are summarized, and their possible mechanisms are analyzed.

Indexed as

FullerenesGadoliniumHumansMetal NanoparticlesNanocapsulesNeoplasmsFullerenesGadoliniumNanocapsules

Identifiers

PMID22961501
PMCPMC3629950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.