Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22961496›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2013

Success rates, quality of life, and feasibility of sacral nerve stimulation in elderly patients: 1-year follow-up.

Roberto Angioli, Roberto Montera, Francesco Plotti, Alessia Aloisi, Eva Montone, Marzio Angelo Zullo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Overactive bladder - 18 years - Part II.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  3. CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto AngioliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Rome Campus Bio-Medico, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Roberto Montera
Francesco Plotti
Alessia Aloisi
Eva Montone
Marzio Angelo Zullo
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrgency urinary incontinence (UUI) frequently occurs in elderly. International guidelines recommend pharmacological therapy as first-line treatment, but elderly do not respond in many cases. The purpose of this study was to report cure rates, quality of life, and feasibility of sacral neurostimulation (SNS) as an alternative option in the elderly. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom October 2008 to April 2010, women >65 years with UUI who were refractory to pharmacological treatments were enrolled in this study and underwent SNS. At 12 months after surgery, patients were asked to compile a 3-day voiding diary and a urogynecologic standardized questionnaire: the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q).

resultsEighteen patients met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen (83.3 %) underwent implantation of the neuromodulator. Twelve months after surgery, an overall success rate of 83.3 % was registered. A statistically significant difference (P<0.0001) between baseline and postsurgery OAB-q scores was recorded.

conclusionsSNS can be considered an alternative treatment for UUI in older women.

Indexed as

Implantable NeurostimulatorsTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, Urge

Identifiers

PMID22961496
OpenAlexW1988900681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.