ArticleClinical oral investigations2013
Analysis of the intraimplant microflora of two-piece dental implants.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Identification and Monitoring Around Two-Piece Dental Implants by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).Journal of laboratory physicians · 2020Article
- Oral bacterial colonization on dental implants restored with titanium or zirconia abutments: 6-month follow-up.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Article
- Inhibition of adherence of C. albicans to dental implants and cover screws by Cymbopogon nardus essential oil and citronellal.Clinical oral investigations · 2015Article
- Microbial Profiles and Detection Techniques in Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchReview
- The effect of dynamic loading on bacterial microleakage of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: AnJournal of Indian Prosthodontic SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInformation about the spectrum of microorganisms in the intraimplant cavities of two-piece dental implants is scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess the intraimplant microflora of two-piece dental implants by conventional biochemical testing, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and 16 s rDNA gene sequencing. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen patients (six men and four women; average age = 66.7 years; age range = 58-78 years) received 35 two-piece titanium implants carrying ball attachments. Biofilm sampling was performed with sterile microbrushes, and nonadherent microbial samples were obtained by injection and reuptake of predefined volumes of NaCl solution. The samples were cultured and analyzed by conventional biochemical testing, MALDI-TOF MS, and 16 s rDNA gene sequencing.
resultsOf the 103 species detected, 27 and 33 were identified only in the biofilm and nonadherent microbial samples, respectively. Forty-three species were identified in both types of samples.
conclusionsTwo-piece dental implants harbored a broad spectrum of gram-positive and gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes, especially rods and cocci. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings confirm bacterial translocation from the oral cavity to intraimplant cavities. Microbiological methods as used in this study are necessary to reveal the complete vital microflora of intraimplant cavities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22961460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.