ArticleNeuromolecular medicine2013
Hypobaric hypoxia and reoxygenation induce proteomic profile changes in the rat brain cortex.
Article in Neuromolecular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers of mature neuronal differentiation and related diseases.Future science OA · 2024Review
- Protein aggregation and biomolecular condensation in hypoxic environments (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Review
- InnovativeFrontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- New Strategies for Stroke Therapy: Nanoencapsulated Neuroglobin.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Quantitative Proteome and Transcriptome Dynamics Analysis Reveals Iron Deficiency Response Networks and Signature in Neuronal Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reversible Brain Abnormalities in People Without Signs of Mountain Sickness During High-Altitude Exposure.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Proteomic identification of novel differentiation plasma protein markers in hypobaric hypoxia-induced rat model.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain, due to its high metabolism, is severely affected by hypoxia/reoxygenation. In this study, cerebral cortexes from rats subjected to hypobaric hypoxia followed by several reoxygenation periods (0 h, 24 h, and 5 days) were compared with normobaric normoxic controls to identify protein-expression differences using proteomic approaches. Only 2-fold differences in spot abundance between controls and experimental groups from each reoxygenation period were considered. The proteins identified were grouped into categories, according to their similarity in function or to their involvement in the same metabolic pathway. We distinguished five groups: (1) glycolysis, including γ-enolase (NSE), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); (2) tricarboxylic acid cycle, such as aconitate hydratase (ACO2); (3) oxidative phosphorylation, like F1-ATPase chains α and β; (4) cytoskeletal, including Spna2, α-tubulin, β-tubulin, β-actin, and microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 3 (EB3); and (5) chaperones, like heat-shock protein 72 kDa (HSP72). NSE was upregulated while GAPDH was downregulated, both peaking at 5 days post-hypoxia. ACO2 and F1-ATPase decreased in all the reoxygenation periods. Spna2 and EB3 were expressed neither in control nor at 0 h, but 5 days post-hypoxia new expression took place. The α- and β-tubulin levels significantly fell at 0 h, but after 24 h strongly increased. Also, β-actin and HSP72 were downregulated, and the last one reached the lowest level at 24 h of reoxygenation. We conclude that the molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia/reoxygenation in the rat cortex might consist of a close relationship between energy metabolism, cytoskeleton, and chaperones. These findings may shed light on therapeutic targets against hypoxia-related damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22961459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.