Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22961356›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2012

Spinal cord ependymomas in children and adolescents.

Martin Benesch, Didier Frappaz, Maura Massimino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ependymoma from Benign to Highly Aggressive Diseases: A Review.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Current management in the treatment of intramedullary ependymomas in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Essential Management of Pediatric Brain Tumors.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pediatric primary high-grade spinal glioma: a National Cancer Database analysis of current patterns in treatment and outcomes.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Radiation therapy after subtotal resection of pediatric grade II/III spinal ependymomas: what is the evidence?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  17. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of intraspinal ependymomas in pediatric patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2014
    Article
  18. Pediatric spinal ependymomas: an unpredictable and puzzling disease. Long-term follow-up of a single consecutive institutional series of ten patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin BeneschDivision of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 38, 8036 Graz, Austria. martin.benesch@klinikum-graz.at
Didier Frappaz
Maura Massimino
Centre Léon Bérard · FRFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITGraz University Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal cord ependymomas are very rare among children and adolescents. Due to their rarity, our current knowledge of these tumors is based on case reports and few retrospective case series.

methodsThe present review summarizes the currently available literature on childhood spinal cord ependymomas.

resultsAlthough overall survival rates are favorable, relapse incidence is high, particularly in myxopapillary ependymomas. Since long-term follow-up data are provided in a limited number of studies only, the true relapse incidence is unknown. Maximal safe radical surgery is the backbone of treatment for children with spinal cord ependymomas, but the impact of adjuvant treatment on progression and survival is still unclear. Presently, the decision to initiate non-surgical treatment depends primarily on the WHO grade of the tumor and the extent of resection. In terms of the known side effects, early radiotherapy should be avoided in children with WHO grade II spinal cord ependymomas irrespective of the extent of resection but is indicated in anaplastic spinal cord ependymomas both after complete and incomplete resection. The high relapse incidence in myxopapillary ependymomas argue for the use of early radiotherapy, but its definitive impact on progression has to be proven in larger series. Close surveillance is important due to the high recurrence rate in all patients with spinal cord ependymomas.

conclusionProspective collection of both clinical and molecular data from a greater number of patients with spinal cord ependymomas within an international collaboration is the prerequisite to establish standardized management guidelines for these rare CNS tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChildChild, PreschoolEpendymomaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeoplasm StagingNeurofibromatosis 2Neurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisSpinal Cord Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22961356
OpenAlexW1973323022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.