Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22960245›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2012

Priapism: pathophysiology and the role of the radiologist.

J E Halls, D V Patel, M Walkden, U Patel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Embolization Treatment of High-Flow Priapism.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Priapism in homozygous sickle cell patients: important clinical and laboratory associations.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2014
    Article
  20. Male urogenital disorders.The British journal of radiology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J E HallsDepartment of Radiology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
D V Patel
M Walkden
U Patel
St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priapism is defined as a penile erection that persists for 4 h or longer and is unrelated to sexual activity. Its identification is important as lack of timely treatment (particularly of the low flow/ischaemic subgroup) can result in persisting erectile dysfunction as a consequence of irreversible corporal fibrosis. This review describes the physiology and anatomy of the normal erection, the aetiology and pathophysiology of the different types of priapism, and the role of the radiologist in the management of the condition. The treatment of iatrogenic priapism following intracavernosal injection of pharmacostimulant is discussed.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePriapism

Identifiers

PMID22960245
PMCPMC3746404
OpenAlexW2052472593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.