Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22959497›Full record

Trial reportMetabolism: clinical and experimental2013

Effect of low- and high-glycemic load on circulating incretins in a randomized clinical trial.

Shauna S Runchey, Liisa M Valsta, Yvonne Schwarz, Chiachi Wang, Xiaoling Song, Johanna W Lampe, Marian L Neuhouser

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low glycaemic index diets for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shauna S RuncheyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Liisa M Valsta
Yvonne Schwarz
Chiachi Wang
Xiaoling Song
Johanna W Lampe
Marian L Neuhouser
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USEuropean Food Safety Authority · IT

Funding

Preventing obesity in low income working adultsU54CA116847 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MCTIERNAN, ANNE M. · 2005 to 2010
$12.6M
Nutrition, Obesity and Atherosclerosis Training ProgramT32HL007028 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Karin E Bornfeldt · 1985 to 2026
$6.4M
Postprandial glycemic response to 4-week low and high glycemic load dietsR03CA132158 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEUHOUSER, MARIAN L · 2007 to 2008
$176k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA132158NCI NIH HHS U54 CA116847NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007028NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL007028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLow-glycemic load diets lower post-prandial glucose and insulin responses; however, the effect of glycemic load on circulating incretin concentrations is unclear. We aimed to assess effects of dietary glycemic load on fasting and post-prandial glucose, insulin and incretin (i.e., glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)) concentrations and to examine for effect modification by adiposity. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a single-center, randomized controlled crossover feeding trial in which a subset of participants had post-prandial testing. Participants were recruited from the local Seattle area. We enrolled 89 overweight-obese (BMI 28.0-39.9 kg/m(2)) and lean (BMI 18.5-25.0 kg/m(2)) healthy adults. Participants consumed two 28-day, weight-maintaining high- and low-glycemic load controlled diets in random order. Primary outcome measures were post-prandial circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, GIP and GLP-1, following a test breakfast.

resultsOf the 80 participants completing both diet interventions, 16 had incretin testing and comprise the group for analyses. Following each 28-day high- and low-glycemic load diet, mean fasting concentrations of insulin, glucose, GIP and GLP-1 were not significantly different. Mean integrated post-prandial concentrations of glucose, insulin and GIP were higher (1504±476 mg/dL/min, p<0.01; 2012±644 μU/mL/min, p<0.01 and 15517±4062 pg/mL/min, p<0.01, respectively) and GLP-1 was lower (-81.6±38.5 pmol/L/min, p<0.03) following the high-glycemic load breakfast as compared to the low-glycemic load breakfast. Body fat did not significantly modify the effect of glycemic load on metabolic outcomes.

conclusionsHigh-glycemic load diets in weight-maintained healthy individuals lead to higher post-prandial GIP and lower post-prandial GLP-1 concentrations. Future studies evaluating dietary glycemic load manipulation of incretin effects would be helpful for establishing diabetes nutrition guidelines.

Indexed as

DietAdiposityAdultBlood GlucoseBreakfastCross-Over StudiesFemaleGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansInsulinMaleObesityPostprandial PeriodYoung AdultBlood GlucoseGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Insulin

Identifiers

PMID22959497
PMCPMC3519963
OpenAlexW2040142654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.