ArticleBMC research notes2012
Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journals.
Article in BMC research notes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Reproducibility in biomedical research.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Towards an understanding of global brain data governance: ethical positions that underpin global brain data governance discourse.Frontiers in big data · 2023Article
- The benefits of data sharing and ensuring open sources of systematic review data.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- The Past Informs the Present, Academic New Media Pitfalls: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019Article
- An analysis and metric of reusable data licensing practices for biomedical resources.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Open for business.Scientific data · 2017Article
- The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot.Chemical science · 2016Article
- Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey.Trials · 2014Article
- A dataset comprising 141 magnetic resonance imaging scans of 98 extant sea urchin species.GigaScience · 2014Article
- Licensing the future: report on BioMed Central's public consultation on open data in peer-reviewed journals.BMC research notes · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copyright and licensing of scientific data, internationally, are complex and present legal barriers to data sharing, integration and reuse, and therefore restrict the most efficient transfer and discovery of scientific knowledge. Much data are included within scientific journal articles, their published tables, additional files (supplementary material) and reference lists. However, these data are usually published under licenses which are not appropriate for data. Creative Commons CC0 is an appropriate and increasingly accepted method for dedicating data to the public domain, to enable data reuse with the minimum of restrictions. BioMed Central is committed to working towards implementation of open data-compliant licensing in its publications. Here we detail a protocol for implementing a combined Creative Commons Attribution license (for copyrightable material) and Creative Commons CC0 waiver (for data) agreement for content published in peer-reviewed open access journals. We explain the differences between legal requirements for attribution in copyright, and cultural requirements in scholarship for giving individuals credit for their work through citation. We argue that publishing data in scientific journals under CC0 will have numerous benefits for individuals and society, and yet will have minimal implications for authors and minimal impact on current publishing and research workflows. We provide practical examples and definitions of data types, such as XML and tabular data, and specific secondary use cases for published data, including text mining, reproducible research, and open bibliography. We believe this proposed change to the current copyright and licensing structure in science publishing will help clarify what users - people and machines - of the published literature can do, legally, with journal articles and make research using the published literature more efficient. We further believe this model could be adopted across multiple publishers, and invite comment on this article from all stakeholders in scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.