Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22957960›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2012

The effects of stochastic and episodic movement of the optimum on the evolution of the G-matrix and the response of the trait mean to selection.

Adam G Jones, R Bürger, S J Arnold, P A Hohenlohe, J C Uyeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antagonistic selection and pleiotropy constrain the evolution of plant chemical defenses.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rethinking Living Fossils.Bioscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Selection on skewed characters and the paradox of stasis.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  12. Modularity: genes, development and evolution.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Fisher's geometric model with a moving optimum.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The evolution of multivariate maternal effects.PLoS computational biology · 2014
    Article
  18. Genomics and the origin of species.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam G JonesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. agjones@neo.tamu.edu
R Bürger
S J Arnold
P A Hohenlohe
J C Uyeda

Funding

The Evolution of Protein FlexibilityP20RR016448 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI HECKENDORN, ROBERT B · 2002 to 2011
$19.3M
Microevolution of conserved developmental genesF32GM076995 · NIGMS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOHENLOHE, PAUL A · 2006 to 2007
$110k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016448NCRR NIH HHS P20RR16448NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM076995NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM076995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical results demonstrate that the G-matrix, which summarizes additive genetic variances and covariances of quantitative traits, changes over time. Such evolution and fluctuation of the G-matrix could potentially have wide-ranging effects on phenotypic evolution. Nevertheless, no studies have yet addressed G-matrix stability and evolution when movement of an intermediate optimum includes large, episodic jumps or stochasticity. Here, we investigate such scenarios by using simulation-based models of G-matrix evolution. These analyses yield four important insights regarding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. (i) Regardless of the model of peak movement, a moving optimum causes the G-matrix to orient towards the direction of net peak movement, so that genetic variance is enhanced in that direction (the variance enhancement effect). (ii) Peak movement skews the distribution of breeding values in the direction of movement, which impedes the response to selection. (iii) The stability of the G-matrix is affected by the overall magnitude and direction of peak movement, but modes and rates of peak movement have surprisingly small effects (the invariance principle). (iv) Both episodic and stochastic peak movement increase the probability that a population will fall below its carrying capacity and go extinct. We also present novel equations for the response of the trait mean to multivariate selection, which take into account the higher moments of the distribution of breeding values.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalComputer SimulationExtinction, BiologicalGenetic DriftGenetic LociGenetic PleiotropyGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationModels, GeneticPhenotypePopulation DensityStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID22957960
PMCPMC3484198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.