Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22957797›Full record

ArticleACS nano2012

Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth.

Taylor J Woehl, James E Evans, Ilke Arslan, William D Ristenpart, Nigel D Browning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Highly robustFood chemistry: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Liquid Phase TEM of Diffusing Emulsion Droplets.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Influence of Additives on theACS applied energy materials · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taylor J WoehlDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA. tjwoehl@ucdavis.edu
James E Evans
Ilke Arslan
William D Ristenpart
Nigel D Browning

Funding

Real-time imaging of dynamic biological processes at nanometer spatial resolutionRC1GM091755 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI EVANS, JAMES E · 2009 to 2010
$999k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5RC1GM091755NIGMS NIH HHS RC1 GM091755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although nanocrystal morphology is controllable using conventional colloidal synthesis, multiple characterization techniques are typically needed to determine key properties like the nucleation rate, induction time, growth rate, and the resulting morphology. Recently, researchers have demonstrated growth of nanocrystals by in situ electron beam reduction, offering direct observations of single nanocrystals and eliminating the need for multiple characterization techniques; however, they found nanocrystal morphologies consistent with two different growth mechanisms for the same electron beam parameters. Here we show that the electron beam current plays a role analogous to the concentration of reducing agent in conventional synthesis, by controlling the growth mechanism and final morphology of silver nanocrystals grown via in situ electron beam reduction. We demonstrate that low beam currents encourage reaction limited growth that yield nanocrystals with faceted structures, while higher beam currents encourage diffusion limited growth that yield spherical nanocrystals. By isolating these two growth regimes, we demonstrate a new level of control over nanocrystal morphology, regulated by the fundamental growth mechanism. We find that the induction threshold dose for nucleation is independent of the beam current, pixel dwell time, and magnification being used. Our results indicate that in situ electron microscopy data can be interpreted by classical models and that systematic dose experiments should be performed for all future in situ liquid studies to confirm the exact mechanisms underlying observations of nucleation and growth.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, MolecularComputer SimulationCrystallizationMacromolecular SubstancesMaterials TestingMetal NanoparticlesMolecular ConformationParticle SizeSilverSurface PropertiesMacromolecular SubstancesSilver

Identifiers

PMID22957797
PMCPMC3482139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.