ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2012
Glucose in the ICU--evidence, guidelines, and outcomes.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascular Glucose Sensor Symposium: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) for Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients at Risk for Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Variability.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Review
- The benefits of tight glycemic control in critical illness: Sweeter than assumed?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2014Review
- Tight glycemic control in the ICU - is the earth flat?Critical care (London, England) · 2014Article
- Comparing data accuracy between structured abstracts and full-text journal articles: implications in their use for informing clinical decisions.Evidence-based medicine · 2013Article
- Retrievable stent thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: analysis of a revolutionizing treatment technique.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22957522What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.