ArticlePloS one2012
An internal model architecture for novelty detection: implications for cerebellar and collicular roles in sensory processing.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Neural mechanisms for the localization of unexpected external motion.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A multizone cerebellar chip for bioinspired adaptive robot control and sensorimotor processing.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- World Statistics Drive Learning of Cerebellar Internal Models in Adaptive Feedback Control: A Case Study Using the Optokinetic Reflex.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020Article
- Event-Related Desynchronization/Synchronization in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Prominent Changes in Cerebro-Cerebellar Functional Connectivity During Continuous Cognitive Processing.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- A comparative approach to cerebellar function: insights from electrosensory systems.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016Review
- Perception as a closed-loop convergence process.eLife · 2016Article
- Redefining the cerebellar cortex as an assembly of non-uniform Purkinje cell microcircuits.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2015Review
- Plasticity of cerebellar Purkinje cells in behavioral training of body balance control.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Biohybrid Control of General Linear Systems Using the Adaptive Filter Model of Cerebellum.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2015Article
- Cerebellum involvement in cortical sensorimotor circuits for the control of voluntary movements.Nature neuroscience · 2014Article
- Plastic corollary discharge predicts sensory consequences of movements in a cerebellum-like circuit.Neuron · 2014Article
- How the cerebellum may monitor sensory information for spatial representation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014Review
- An adaptive filter model of cerebellar zone C3 as a basis for safe limb control?The Journal of physiology · 2013Review
- Functional role of the cerebellum in gamma-band synchronization of the sensory and motor cortices.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cerebellum is thought to implement internal models for sensory prediction, but details of the underlying circuitry are currently obscure. We therefore investigated a specific example of internal-model based sensory prediction, namely detection of whisker contacts during whisking. Inputs from the vibrissae in rats can be affected by signals generated by whisker movement, a phenomenon also observable in whisking robots. Robot novelty-detection can be improved by adaptive noise-cancellation, in which an adaptive filter learns a forward model of the whisker plant that allows the sensory effects of whisking to be predicted and thus subtracted from the noisy sensory input. However, the forward model only uses information from an efference copy of the whisking commands. Here we show that the addition of sensory information from the whiskers allows the adaptive filter to learn a more complex internal model that performs more robustly than the forward model, particularly when the whisking-induced interference has a periodic structure. We then propose a neural equivalent of the circuitry required for adaptive novelty-detection in the robot, in which the role of the adaptive filter is carried out by the cerebellum, with the comparison of its output (an estimate of the self-induced interference) and the original vibrissal signal occurring in the superior colliculus, a structure noted for its central role in novelty detection. This proposal makes a specific prediction concerning the whisker-related functions of a region in cerebellar cortical zone A(2) that in rats receives climbing fibre input from the superior colliculus (via the inferior olive). This region has not been observed in non-whisking animals such as cats and primates, and its functional role in vibrissal processing has hitherto remained mysterious. Further investigation of this system may throw light on how cerebellar-based internal models could be used in broader sensory, motor and cognitive contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.