ArticlePloS one2012
Evolution of genes involved in gamete interaction: evidence for positive selection, duplications and losses in vertebrates.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparative functional analyses of the prostate-specific KLK3 enzyme in primates reveal the impact of sexual selection.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- The roles of gene duplications in the dynamics of evolutionary conflicts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of Gibberellic Acid-Stimulated Arabidopsis Gene Family in Pineapple (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Case report: A novel homozygous variant in ZP3 is associated with human empty follicle syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Identification, Evolution, and Expression Analysis of GASA Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Domain Expansion and Functional Diversification in Vertebrate Reproductive Proteins.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Genome-wide analysis of sucrose synthase family in soybean and their expression in response to abiotic stress and seed development.PloS one · 2022Article
- The Importance of Gene Duplication and Domain Repeat Expansion for the Function and Evolution of Fertilization Proteins.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Proteomics support the threespine stickleback egg coat as a protective oocyte envelope.Molecular reproduction and development · 2021Article
- The Crazy Ovary.Genes · 2021Review
- Review
- A genome-wide approach to the comprehensive analysis of GASA gene family in Glycine max.Plant molecular biology · 2019Article
- Molecular evolution of mammalian genes with epistatic interactions in fertilization.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Evolutionary Analysis of Makorin Ring Finger Protein 3 Reveals Positive Selection in Mammals.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2019Article
- Egg Coat Proteins Across Metazoan Evolution.Current topics in developmental biology · 2018Review
- Article
- Maximum-likelihood approaches reveal signatures of positive selection in BMP15 and GDF9 genes modulating ovarian function in mammalian female fertility.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genes encoding proteins involved in sperm-egg interaction and fertilization exhibit a particularly fast evolution and may participate in prezygotic species isolation [1], [2]. Some of them (ZP3, ADAM1, ADAM2, ACR and CD9) have individually been shown to evolve under positive selection [3], [4], suggesting a role of positive Darwinian selection on sperm-egg interaction. However, the genes involved in this biological function have not been systematically and exhaustively studied with an evolutionary perspective, in particular across vertebrates with internal and external fertilization. Here we show that 33 genes among the 69 that have been experimentally shown to be involved in fertilization in at least one taxon in vertebrates are under positive selection. Moreover, we identified 17 pseudogenes and 39 genes that have at least one duplicate in one species. For 15 genes, we found neither positive selection, nor gene copies or pseudogenes. Genes of teleosts, especially genes involved in sperm-oolemma fusion, appear to be more frequently under positive selection than genes of birds and eutherians. In contrast, pseudogenization, gene loss and gene gain are more frequent in eutherians. Thus, each of the 19 studied vertebrate species exhibits a unique signature characterized by gene gain and loss, as well as position of amino acids under positive selection. Reflecting these clade-specific signatures, teleosts and eutherian mammals are recovered as clades in a parsimony analysis. Interestingly the same analysis places Xenopus apart from teleosts, with which it shares the primitive external fertilization, and locates it along with amniotes (which share internal fertilization), suggesting that external or internal environmental conditions of germ cell interaction may not be the unique factors that drive the evolution of fertilization genes. Our work should improve our understanding of the fertilization process and on the establishment of reproductive barriers, for example by offering new leads for experiments on genes identified as positively selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.