Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22956995›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Population structure of Bartonella henselae in Algerian urban stray cats.

Naouelle Azzag, Nadia Haddad, Benoit Durand, Elisabeth Petit, Ali Ammouche, Bruno Chomel, Henri-Jean Boulouis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Global Molecular Prevalence ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Feline-Human Zoonosis Transmission in North Africa: A Systematic Review.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. HemotropicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naouelle AzzagEcole Nationale Supérieure Vétérinaire d'Alger, El Harrach, Alger, Algérie.
Nadia Haddad
Benoit Durand
Elisabeth Petit
Ali Ammouche
Bruno Chomel
Henri-Jean Boulouis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole blood samples from 211 stray cats from Algiers, Algeria, were cultured to detect the presence of Bartonella species and to evaluate the genetic diversity of B. henselae strains by multiple locus VNTR analysis (MLVA). Bartonella henselae was the only species isolated from 36 (17%) of 211 cats. B. henselae genotype I was the predominant genotype (64%). MLVA typing of 259 strains from 30 bacteremic cats revealed 52 different profiles as compared to only 3 profiles using MLST. Of these 52 profiles, 48 (92.3%) were identified for the first time. One-third of the cats harbored one MLVA profile only. As there was a correlation between the age of cats and the number of MLVA profiles, we hypothesized that the single profile in these cats was the profile of the initial infecting strain. Two-third of the cats harbored 2 to 6 MLVA profiles simultaneously. The similarity of MLVA profiles obtained from the same cat, neighbor-joining clustering and structure-neighbor clustering indicate that such a diversity likely results from two different mechanisms occurring either independently or simultaneously: independent infections and genetic drift from a primary strain.

Indexed as

AlgeriaAnimalsBacteremiaBacterial Typing TechniquesBartonella henselaeBartonella InfectionsCatsCluster AnalysisFemaleGenes, BacterialGenotypeMaleMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID22956995
PMCPMC3428342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.