Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22956731›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2012

File formats commonly used in mass spectrometry proteomics.

Eric W Deutsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Tandem Mass Spectral Databases and Their Use in Non-Targeted Metabolomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Software Options for the Analysis of MS-Proteomic Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format.Journal of proteome research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. eric.deutsch@systemsbiology.org

Funding

Quantitative Systems BiologyP50GM076547 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BALIGA, NITIN S · 2006 to 2016
$30.6M
Shortening the development cycle time of Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools with high performance computingR01GM087221 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2010 to 2021
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076547NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of mass spectrometry (MS) to the analysis of proteomes has enabled the high-throughput identification and abundance measurement of hundreds to thousands of proteins per experiment. However, the formidable informatics challenge associated with analyzing MS data has required a wide variety of data file formats to encode the complex data types associated with MS workflows. These formats encompass the encoding of input instruction for instruments, output products of the instruments, and several levels of information and results used by and produced by the informatics analysis tools. A brief overview of the most common file formats in use today is presented here, along with a discussion of related topics.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingComputer Storage DevicesComputer SystemsDatabases, ProteinMass SpectrometryProteomeProteomicsSoftwareProteome

Identifiers

PMID22956731
PMCPMC3518119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.