ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2013
Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with haemophilia presenting with acute coronary syndrome: an interventional dilemma: case series, review of the literature, and tips for management.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of patients with congenital bleeding disorders and cardiac indications for antithrombotic therapy.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Review
- Debates Surrounding the Use of Antithrombotic Therapy in Hemophilic Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Best Strategies to Minimize Severe Bleeding Risk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Acquired Hemophilia A and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): A Rare Presentation and Management Dilemma.Cureus · 2023Article
- Acute coronary syndrome in patients with hemophilia: a delicate balancing act.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Review
- Current Therapeutic Approach to Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Current Practice of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Coagulation Disorders.Cureus · 2021Review
- How to Manage a Patient with Haemophilia and ACS Requiring PCI: A Battle between Bleeding and Thrombosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Current concepts in the management of stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome in patients with hemophilia.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Consensus review of the treatment of cardiovascular disease in people with hemophilia A and B.Cardiology in reviewReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the introduction of clotting factor concentrates over 50 years ago the life expectancy of patients with hemophilia (PWH) has increased to over 70 years. Consequently, diseases of the ageing population, including coronary artery disease, are increasingly being encountered. These patients present a unique therapeutic problem due to their greatly increased bleeding risk. Randomized controlled studies specific to PWH are lacking, emphasizing the need for case series. We present three cases of acute coronary syndrome in PWH who underwent urgent percutaneous coronary intervention at our institution, and summarize the available literature on the topic. We describe their management and outcome and provide points to consider when treating these complex patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.