Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22956290›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2012

Deterministic versus stochastic cell polarisation through wave-pinning.

Georg R Walther, Athanasius F M Marée, Leah Edelstein-Keshet, Verônica A Grieneisen

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of Cell Polarization.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stochastic transitions in a bistable reaction system on the membrane.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2013
    Article
  20. From simple to detailed models for cell polarization.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Georg R WaltherComputational & Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Athanasius F M Marée
Leah Edelstein-Keshet
Verônica A Grieneisen
Norwich Research Park · GBJohn Innes Centre · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Control of Actin Assembly and Cell Migration by Actin-Regulating ProteinsR01GM086882 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSSON, ANDERS E · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0645Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0646NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell polarization is an important part of the response of eukaryotic cells to stimuli, and forms a primary step in cell motility, differentiation, and many cellular functions. Among the important biochemical players implicated in the onset of intracellular asymmetries that constitute the early phases of polarization are the Rho GTPases, such as Cdc42, Rac, and Rho, which present high active concentration levels in a spatially localized manner. Rho GTPases exhibit positive feedback-driven interconversion between distinct active and inactive forms, the former residing on the cell membrane, and the latter predominantly in the cytosol. A deterministic model of the dynamics of a single Rho GTPase described earlier by Mori et al. exhibits sustained polarization by a wave-pinning mechanism. It remained, however, unclear how such polarization behaves at typically low cellular concentrations, as stochasticity could significantly affect the dynamics. We therefore study the low copy number dynamics of this model, using a stochastic kinetics framework based on the Gillespie algorithm, and propose statistical and analytic techniques which help us analyse the equilibrium behaviour of our stochastic system. We use local perturbation analysis to predict parameter regimes for initiation of polarity and wave-pinning in our deterministic system, and compare these predictions with deterministic and stochastic spatial simulations. Comparing the behaviour of the stochastic with the deterministic system, we determine the threshold number of molecules required for robust polarization in a given effective reaction volume. We show that when the molecule number is lowered wave-pinning behaviour is lost due to an increasingly large transition zone as well as increasing fluctuations in the pinning position, due to which a broadness can be reached that is unsustainable, causing the collapse of the wave, while the variations in the high and low equilibrium levels are much less affected.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell PolarityEukaryotic CellsKineticsNumerical Analysis, Computer-Assistedrho GTP-Binding ProteinsStochastic Processesrho GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22956290
PMCPMC3480592
OpenAlexW2112180211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.