Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22956016›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2012

Analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block in robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy using a transaxillary approach.

Seokyung Shin, Woung Youn Chung, Jong Ju Jeong, Sang-Wook Kang, Young Jun Oh

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block on Postoperative Pain in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Local infiltration anesthesia: does it really work?Annals of translational medicine · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seokyung ShinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Woung Youn Chung
Jong Ju Jeong
Sang-Wook Kang
Young Jun Oh
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNerve blocks and infiltration with local anesthetics are commonly employed methods for postoperative pain control. This prospective, randomized trial was conducted to determine whether bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is effective for reducing acute postoperative pain after robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy (RAET) and to compare its effects with that of local wound infiltration (LWI).

methodsNinety-seven patients who were to undergo RAET were randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive BSCPB with either 20 mL of 0.525% ropivacaine (BSCPB group, n=32) or 20 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution (Control group, n=32) or LWI with 20 mL of 0.525% ropivacaine (LWI group, n=33). Postoperative pain scores were assessed at the postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients with VAS scores of ≥40 were administered rescue analgesics according to a standardized protocol. The main outcome variables were pain scores during the first postoperative 24 h and the number of patients requiring postoperative analgesic rescue.

resultsThe BSCBP and LWI groups showed lower pain scores compared with the Control group at the PACU. The BSCPB group continued to show significantly lower pain scores compared with the LWI and Control groups at postoperative 6 and 24 h. The number of patients requiring analgesic rescue at the PACU was lower in the BSCPB and LWI groups than in the Control group. The number of patients requiring additional rescue analgesics after discharge from the PACU until the first 24 postoperative h was lower in the BSCPB group than in the LWI group.

conclusionsBSCPB and LWI are effective for reducing pain scores and analgesic requirements during the immediate postoperative period in patients who undergo RAET, with BSCPB being superior to LWI at postoperative 6-24 h.

Indexed as

EndoscopyNerve BlockRoboticsAdministration, TopicalAdultAmidesAnesthetics, LocalAxillaCervical PlexusDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainAmidesAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID22956016
OpenAlexW1985388981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.