Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22956003›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2013

Concurrent validity of questions on arm, shoulder and neck symptoms of the RSI QuickScan.

Marco J M Hoozemans, Erwin M Speklé, Jaap H van Dieën

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. German version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ): translation and validation.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco J M HoozemansFaculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, m.j.m.hoozemans@vu.nl.
Erwin M Speklé
Jaap H van Dieën

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective was to determine the concurrent validity of questions on arm, shoulder and neck symptoms of an Internet-based questionnaire. In addition, the inter-observer reliability of physical examinations by occupational physicians was investigated.

methodsA total of 160 employees of a Dutch occupational health service were approached, of which 106 participated. Right after the assessment of arm, shoulder and neck symptoms using a self-administered questionnaire, each participant was examined by two occupational physicians. The presence of symptoms in the past 7 days was compared to the physical examinations. The participation of two occupational physicians allowed us to study also the inter-observer reliability.

resultsOverall, the concurrent validity of the symptom questions of the questionnaire can be defined as poor to moderate with κ values between 0.16 and 0.53. Detecting the presence of symptoms (p(pos)) could be considered as moderately valid with values below 0.60, but the p(neg) shows that the concurrent validity for detecting the absence of arm, shoulder or neck symptoms can be considered sufficient with values above 0.69. The agreement between occupational physicians can, with a few exceptions, be considered as moderate with κ values below 0.60. The agreement was sufficient for detecting the absence of symptoms (p(neg) > 0.7).

conclusionsThe agreement between the symptom questions of the questionnaire and physical examinations of occupational physicians can be considered as poor to moderate. The results are comparable to what is generally reported in the literature. Future studies should be aimed at gaining more fundamental knowledge about the possible conceptual differences between self-reported symptoms and symptoms assessed using physical examinations. Moreover, it is advisable to improve the inter-observer reliability of physical examinations as applied in the present study.

Indexed as

Occupational MedicinePhysical ExaminationSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultArm InjuriesComputer TerminalsCumulative Trauma DisordersFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeck InjuriesNeck PainNetherlandsObserver Variation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.