Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22955972›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

What does our genome encode?

John A Stamatoyannopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Genetic Architecture of Multimodal Human Brain Age.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biology and Mechanisms of Action of the Vitamin D Hormone.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Epigenetic regulation of bone cells.Connective tissue research · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Spatial genome organization and cognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John A StamatoyannopoulosDepartments of Genome Sciences and Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. jstam@u.washington.edu

Funding

A Comprehensive catalog of human DNasel hypersensitive sitesU54HG004592 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, JOHN A · 2007 to 2011
$15.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004592NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG004592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In its first production phase, The ENCODE Project Consortium (ENCODE) has generated thousands of genome-scale data sets, resulting in a genomic "parts list" that encompasses transcripts, sites of transcription factor binding, and other functional features that now number in the millions of distinct elements. These data are reshaping many long-held beliefs concerning the information content of the human and other complex genomes, including the very definition of the gene. Here I discuss and place in context many of the leading findings of ENCODE, as well as trends that are shaping the generation and interpretation of ENCODE data. Finally, I consider prospects for the future, including maximizing the accuracy, completeness, and utility of ENCODE data for the community.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomicsHuman Genome ProjectHumans

Identifiers

PMID22955972
PMCPMC3431477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.