Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22955656›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2012

New strategy for automatic tumor segmentation by adaptive thresholding on PET/CT images.

Mazen Moussallem, Pierre-Jean Valette, Alexandra Traverse-Glehen, Claire Houzard, Christophe Jegou, Francesco Giammarile

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Data integrity systems for organ contours in radiation therapy planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2018
    Article
  5. Preprocessing ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mazen MoussallemNuclear Medicine Unit,1 Imaging Department, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France. mazenphm@hotmail.com
Pierre-Jean Valette
Alexandra Traverse-Glehen
Claire Houzard
Christophe Jegou
Francesco Giammarile
Hôpital Lyon Sud · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor delineation is a critical aspect in radiotherapy treatment planning and is usually performed with the anatomical images of a computed tomography (CT) scan. For non-small cell lung cancer, it has been recommended to use functional positron emission tomography (PET) images to take into account the biological target characteristics. However, today, there is no satisfactory segmentation technique for PET images in clinical applications. In the present study, a solution to this problem is proposed. The development of the segmentation technique is based on the threshold's adjustment directly from patients, rather than from phantoms. To this end, two references were chosen: measurements performed on CT images of the selected lesions, and histological measurements of surgically removed tumors. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were chosen to produce references that are assumed to have measured tumor sizes equal to the true in vivo tumor sizes. In total, for the two references, 65 lung lesions of 54 patients referred for FDG-PET/CT exams were selected. For validation, measurements of segmented lesions on PET images using this technique were also compared to CT and histological measurements. For lesions greater than 20 mm, our segmentation technique showed a good estimation of histological measurements (mean difference between measured and calculated data equal to -0.8 ± 9.0%) and an acceptable estimation of CT measurements. For lesions smaller than or equal to 20 mm, the method showed disagreement with the measurements derived from histological or CT data. This novel segmentation technique shows high accuracy for the lesions with largest axes between 2 and 4.5 cm. However, it does not correctly evaluate smaller lesions, likely due to the partial volume effect and/or respiratory motions.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, AutomatedPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID22955656
PMCPMC5718227
OpenAlexW2168057128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.