ArticleCancer biology & therapy2012
Characterization of the conversion between CD133+ and CD133- cells in colon cancer SW620 cell line.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling Theranostics: Nanocomplex-Assisted Photodynamic Eradication of Aggressive Cancer Cells and Modulation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Statistical inference of the rates of cell proliferation and phenotypic switching in cancer.Journal of theoretical biology · 2023Article
- Aptamers as Smart Ligands for Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Comparison of Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells and Oxaliplatin-Resistant Cells Unveils Functional Similarities.Cells · 2022Article
- Dissecting the mechanism of temozolomide resistance and its association with the regulatory roles of intracellular reactive oxygen species in glioblastoma.Journal of biomedical science · 2021Review
- Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Monitoring Chemoresistance of Cancer Cells.Micromachines · 2020Review
- An Fc-Optimized CD133 Antibody for Induction of Natural Killer Cell Reactivity against Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2019Article
- CD133-targeted oncolytic adenovirus demonstrates anti-tumor effect in colorectal cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2-signaling in CD133-expressing cells in renal clear cell carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Valproic Acid Increases CD133 Positive Cells that Show Low Sensitivity to Cytostatics in Neuroblastoma.PloS one · 2016Article
- Biomarkers and signaling pathways of colorectal cancer stem cells.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Review
- Cancer stem cells in colorectal cancer from pathogenesis to therapy: controversies and perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- CD133: a stem cell biomarker and beyond.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The state of cancer stem cells (CSC) under reversible fluctuations, which has been revealed in breast cancer cells most recently, suggests that subpopulations with distinct phenotypes and functions within cancer cells can undergo inter-conversion. To investigate the possibility in colon cancer cells, we employed CD133 as the CSC marker, and characterized CD133 expression pattern and the biological features of the CD133 (+) and CD133 (-) subsets. Flow cytometry revealed that CD133 was bimodally expressed in SW620 cells among eight colon cancer cell lines. The CD133 (+) clonal SW620 cells displayed a differential gene expression profile, higher cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), enhanced tumorigenesis and resistance to 5-fluorouracil. The conversion in term of the CD133 phenotype of the sorted cells was observed in vitro and in vivo. The fraction of the CD133 (+) cells decreased from 99% to 80% in the sorted CD133 (+) population while rising from 5 to 10% in the sorted CD133 (-) population during the first 20-day cultivation and then stayed almost unchanged. A fraction (about 20%) of the CD133 (+) clonal cells lost their CD133 marker while about 10% of the CD133 (-) clonal cells acquired the CD133 marker. 5-Azacytidine enhanced the fraction of the CD133 (+) cells in both of the CD133 (+) and CD133 (-) clonal cells. Our data demonstrate that CD133 expression is dynamic and reversible, and reveal the inter-conversion between the CD133 (+) and the CD133 (-) SW620 cells, suggesting that the CD133 phenotype of SW620 cell population is retained by the conversion between the two cell subsets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.