Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22954206›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2012

A novel multiplex-protein array for serum diagnostics of colon cancer: a case-control study.

Stefanie Bünger, Ulrike Haug, Maria Kelly, Nicole Posorski, Katja Klempt-Giessing, Andrew Cartwright, Stephen P Fitzgerald, Vicki Toner, Damien McAleer, Timo Gemoll and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarker profiling of plasma samples utilizing RANDOX biochip array technology.International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NicotinamideInternational journal of tryptophan research : IJTR · 2017
    Review
  18. Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  19. Association of serum cytokines with colorectal polyp number and type in adult males.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie BüngerLaboratory for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Ulrike Haug
Maria Kelly
Nicole Posorski
Katja Klempt-Giessing
Andrew Cartwright
Stephen P Fitzgerald
Vicki Toner
Damien McAleer
Timo Gemoll
Tilman Laubert
Jürgen Büning
Klaus Fellermann
Hans-Peter Bruch
Uwe J Roblick
Hermann Brenner
Ferdinand von Eggeling
Jens K Habermann
University of Lübeck · DERandox (United Kingdom) · GBJena University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 1.2 million new cases of colorectal cancer are reported each year worldwide. Despite actual screening programs, about 50% of the patients are diagnosed at advanced tumor stages presenting poor prognosis. Innovative screening tools could aid the detection at early stages and allow curative treatment interventions.

methodsA nine target multiplex serum protein biochip was generated and evaluated using a training- and validation-set of 317 highly standardized, liquid nitrogen preserved serum samples comprising controls, adenomas, and colon cancers.

resultsSerum levels of CEA, IL-8, VEGF, S100A11, MCSF, C3adesArg, CD26, and CRP showed significant differences between cases and controls. The largest areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve were observed for CEA, IL-8, and CRP. At threshold levels yielding 90% specificity, sensitivities for CEA, IL-8 and CRP were 26%, 22%, and 17%, respectively. The most promising marker combinations were CEA + IL-8 reaching 37% sensitivity at 83% specificity and CEA + CRP with 35% sensitivity at 81% specificity. In an independent validation set CEA + IL-8 reached 47% sensitivity at 86% specificity while CEA + CRP obtained 39% sensitivity at 86% specificity. Early carcinomas were detected with 33% sensitivity for CEA + IL-8 and 28% for CEA + CRP.

conclusionsApart from CEA, IL-8, and CRP, the screening value of additional blood markers and the potential advantage of combining serum biochip testing with fecal occult blood testing needs to be studied. Multiplex biochip array technology utilizing serum samples offers an innovative approach to colorectal cancer screening.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesColonic NeoplasmsComputational BiologyC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansInterleukin-8MaleBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-8

Identifiers

PMID22954206
PMCPMC3502594
OpenAlexW2053726322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.