Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22954204›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2012

Systematic comparison of reverse phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography platforms for the analysis of N-linked glycans.

S Hunter Walker, Brandon C Carlisle, David C Muddiman

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-throughput SerumMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Reversed-phase separation methods for glycan analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Quantitative Glycomics and Proteomics Combined Purification Strategy.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Hunter WalkerW.M. Keck FT-ICR Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.
Brandon C Carlisle
David C Muddiman
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Molecular Biotechnology Training at North Carolina State UniversityT32GM008776 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KELLY, ROBERT M · 2000 to 2019
$3.9M
Development and Application of Novel Glycan-Specific Reagents to Facilitate EarlyR33CA147988 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MUDDIMAN, DAVID C., PETITTE, JAMES N · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA147988NCI NIH HHS R33 CA147988-02NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM00-8776-08NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the hydrophilic nature of glycans, reverse phase chromatography has not been widely used as a glycomic separation technique coupled to mass spectrometry. Other approaches such as hydrophilic interaction chromatography and porous graphitized carbon chromatography are often employed, though these strategies frequently suffer from decreased chromatographic resolution, long equilibration times, indefinite retention, and column bleed. Herein, it is shown that, through an efficient hydrazone formation derivatization of N-linked glycans (~4 h of additional sample preparation time which is carried out in parallel), numerous experimental and practical advantages are gained when analyzing the glycans by online reverse phase chromatography. These benefits include an increased number of glycans detected, increased peak capacity of the separation, and the ability to analyze glycans on the identical liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry platform commonly used for proteomic analyses. The data presented show that separation of derivatized N-linked glycans by reverse phase chromatography significantly out-performs traditional separation of native or derivatized glycans by hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Furthermore, the movement to a more ubiquitous separation technique will afford numerous research groups the opportunity to analyze both proteomic and glycomic samples on the same platform with minimal time and physical change between experiments, increasing the efficiency of "multiomic" biological approaches.

Indexed as

Chromatography, Reverse-PhaseHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMass SpectrometryPolysaccharidesPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID22954204
PMCPMC3689152
OpenAlexW2014833287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.