ArticleMolecular imaging
In vivo optical molecular imaging of matrix metalloproteinase activity following celecoxib therapy for colorectal cancer.
Article in Molecular imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into the Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Precancerous Conditions and in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Recent progress in the imaging detection of enzyme activitiesRSC advances · 2019Review
- Neutrophil Elastase Activity Imaging: Recent Approaches in the Design and Applications of Activity-Based Probes and Substrate-Based Probes.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2019Review
- The effect of celecoxib on tumor growth in ovarian cancer cells and a genetically engineered mouse model of serous ovarian cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Pilot Clinical Trial of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Augmented Colonoscopy in High Risk Patients.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
- Antibody-based imaging strategies for cancer.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present an optical molecular imaging approach to measure the efficacy of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib on tumor growth rate through its effect on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity. A xenograft model of colorectal cancer was generated in nude mice, which were then randomized to receive celecoxib versus vehicle. MMP activity was measured by an enzyme-activatable optical molecular probe. A novel genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model of colorectal cancer was also used to assess celecoxib's effect on MMP activity, which was measured by quantitative fluorescence colonoscopy. Subcutaneously implanted xenograft tumors were 84% (SD 20.2%) smaller in volume in the treatment group versus the control group. Moreover, treated animals exhibited only a 7.6% (SEM 9%) increase in MMP activity versus 106% (SEM 8%) for untreated animals. There was an apparent linear relationship (r = .91) between measured MMP activity and tumor growth rate. Finally, in the GEM model experiment, treated murine tumors remained relatively unchanged in volume and MMP activity; however, untreated tumors grew significantly and showed an increase in MMP activity. This method may provide for the improved identification of patients for whom COX-2 inhibition therapy is indicated by allowing one to balance the patient's cardiovascular risk with the cancer's responsiveness to celecoxib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22954186PMC3683544W2189505230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.