Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952980›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Protective efficacy of Newcastle disease virus expressing soluble trimeric hemagglutinin against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza in chickens and mice.

Lisette A H M Cornelissen, Olav S de Leeuw, Mirriam G Tacken, Heleen C Klos, Robert P de Vries, Els A de Boer-Luijtze, Diana J van Zoelen-Bos, Alan Rigter, Peter J M Rottier, Rob J M Moormann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Viral vector-based influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Negative-Strand RNA Virus-Vectored Vaccines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisette A H M CornelissenCentral Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands. lisette.cornelissen@wur.nl
Olav S de Leeuw
Mirriam G Tacken
Heleen C Klos
Robert P de Vries
Els A de Boer-Luijtze
Diana J van Zoelen-Bos
Alan Rigter
Peter J M Rottier
Rob J M Moormann
Cornelis A M de Haan
Wageningen University & Research · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHighly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) causes a highly contagious often fatal disease in poultry, resulting in significant economic losses in the poultry industry. HPAIV H5N1 also poses a major public health threat as it can be transmitted directly from infected poultry to humans. One effective way to combat avian influenza with pandemic potential is through the vaccination of poultry. Several live vaccines based on attenuated Newcastle disease virus (NDV) that express influenza hemagglutinin (HA) have been developed to protect chickens or mammalian species against HPAIV. However, the zoonotic potential of NDV raises safety concerns regarding the use of live NDV recombinants, as the incorporation of a heterologous attachment protein may result in the generation of NDV with altered tropism and/or pathogenicity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn the present study we generated recombinant NDVs expressing either full length, membrane-anchored HA of the H5 subtype (NDV-H5) or a soluble trimeric form thereof (NDV-sH5(3)). A single intramuscular immunization with NDV-sH5(3) or NDV-H5 fully protected chickens against disease after a lethal challenge with H5N1 and reduced levels of virus shedding in tracheal and cloacal swabs. NDV-sH5(3) was less protective than NDV-H5 (50% vs 80% protection) when administered via the respiratory tract. The NDV-sH5(3) was ineffective in mice, regardless of whether administered oculonasally or intramuscularly. In this species, NDV-H5 induced protective immunity against HPAIV H5N1, but only after oculonasal administration, despite the poor H5-specific serum antibody response it elicited. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although NDV expressing membrane anchored H5 in general provided better protection than its counterpart expressing soluble H5, chickens could be fully protected against a lethal challenge with H5N1 by using the latter NDV vector. This study thus provides proof of concept for the use of recombinant vector vaccines expressing a soluble form of a heterologous viral membrane protein. Such vectors may be advantageous as they preclude the incorporation of heterologous membrane proteins into the viral vector particles.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibody FormationChickensFemaleHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNewcastle disease virusOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsProtein MultimerizationRecombination, GeneticSolubilityTreatment OutcomeHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus

Identifiers

PMID22952980
PMCPMC3429475
OpenAlexW2138675396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.