Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Evaluation of new reference genes in papaya for accurate transcript normalization under different experimental conditions.

Xiaoyang Zhu, Xueping Li, Weixin Chen, Jianye Chen, Wangjin Lu, Lei Chen, Danwen Fu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Screening of Reference Gene for RT-qPCR inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances in Molecular Research of Tropical Fruit.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Validation of Appropriate Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Normalization in Oat (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Analysis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoyang ZhuState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Guangdong Key Laboratory for Postharvest Science and Technology, College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Xueping Li
Weixin Chen
Jianye Chen
Wangjin Lu
Lei Chen
Danwen Fu
South China Agricultural University · CNState Key Laboratory For Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is a preferred method for rapid and accurate quantification of gene expression studies. Appropriate application of RT-qPCR requires accurate normalization though the use of reference genes. As no single reference gene is universally suitable for all experiments, thus reference gene(s) validation under different experimental conditions is crucial for RT-qPCR analysis. To date, only a few studies on reference genes have been done in other plants but none in papaya. In the present work, we selected 21 candidate reference genes, and evaluated their expression stability in 246 papaya fruit samples using three algorithms, geNorm, NormFinder and RefFinder. The samples consisted of 13 sets collected under different experimental conditions, including various tissues, different storage temperatures, different cultivars, developmental stages, postharvest ripening, modified atmosphere packaging, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment, hot water treatment, biotic stress and hormone treatment. Our results demonstrated that expression stability varied greatly between reference genes and that different suitable reference gene(s) or combination of reference genes for normalization should be validated according to the experimental conditions. In general, the internal reference genes EIF (Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A), TBP1 (TATA binding protein 1) and TBP2 (TATA binding protein 2) genes had a good performance under most experimental conditions, whereas the most widely present used reference genes, ACTIN (Actin 2), 18S rRNA (18S ribosomal RNA) and GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) were not suitable in many experimental conditions. In addition, two commonly used programs, geNorm and Normfinder, were proved sufficient for the validation. This work provides the first systematic analysis for the selection of superior reference genes for accurate transcript normalization in papaya under different experimental conditions.

Indexed as

CaricaGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic Association StudiesPlant ProteinsReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSoftwarePlant ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22952972
PMCPMC3432124
OpenAlexW1974517295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.