Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952639›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

29 mammalian genomes reveal novel exaptations of mobile elements for likely regulatory functions in the human genome.

Craig B Lowe, David Haussler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enrichment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cis-Regulatory Elements in Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Transposable elements in human genetic disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mammalian transposable elements and their impacts on genome evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig B LoweCenter for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
David Haussler
University of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

EDAC: ENCODE Data Analysis CenterU01HG004695 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI BIRNEY, EWAN · 2008 to 2012
$6.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS 5U01 HG004695-03NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research supports the view that changes in gene regulation, as opposed to changes in the genes themselves, play a significant role in morphological evolution. Gene regulation is largely dependent on transcription factor binding sites. Researchers are now able to use the available 29 mammalian genomes to measure selective constraint at the level of binding sites. This detailed map of constraint suggests that mammalian genomes co-opt fragments of mobile elements to act as gene regulatory sequence on a large scale. In the human genome we detect over 280,000 putative regulatory elements, totaling approximately 7 Mb of sequence, that originated as mobile element insertions. These putative regulatory regions are conserved non-exonic elements (CNEEs), which show considerable cross-species constraint and signatures of continued negative selection in humans, yet do not appear in a known mature transcript. These putative regulatory elements were co-opted from SINE, LINE, LTR and DNA transposon insertions. We demonstrate that at least 11%, and an estimated 20%, of gene regulatory sequence in the human genome showing cross-species conservation was co-opted from mobile elements. The location in the genome of CNEEs co-opted from mobile elements closely resembles that of CNEEs in general, except in the centers of the largest gene deserts where recognizable co-option events are relatively rare. We find that regions of certain mobile element insertions are more likely to be held under purifying selection than others. In particular, we show 6 examples where paralogous instances of an often co-opted mobile element region define a sequence motif that closely matches a transcription factor's binding profile.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome, HumanRegulatory Elements, Transcriptional5' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsBinding SitesGene FrequencyHumansMammalsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPhylogenyProtein BindingSequence AlignmentTranscription Factors5' Untranslated RegionsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22952639
PMCPMC3428314
OpenAlexW2000609514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.