ArticlePloS one2012
Estimating the numbers of malaria infections in blood samples using high-resolution genotyping data.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular surveillance of multiplicity of infection, haplotype frequencies, and prevalence in infectious diseases.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A maximum-likelihood method to estimate haplotype frequencies and prevalence alongside multiplicity of infection from SNP data.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2022Article
- The many definitions of multiplicity of infection.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2022Article
- Evolutionary genetics of malaria.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Sex-based differences in clearance of chroniceLife · 2020Article
- Intra-host dynamics of co-infecting parasite genotypes in asymptomatic malaria patients.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Large and finite sample properties of a maximum-likelihood estimator for multiplicity of infection.PloS one · 2018Article
- Malaria Epidemiology at the Clone Level.Trends in parasitology · 2017Review
- Article
- The Incidence and Differential Seasonal Patterns of Plasmodium vivax Primary Infections and Relapses in a Cohort of Children in Papua New Guinea.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- Article
- Dissecting the determinants of malaria chronicity: why within-host models struggle to reproduce infection dynamics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015Article
- Not "out of Nantucket": Babesia microti in southern New England comprises at least two major populations.Parasites & vectors · 2014Article
- estMOI: estimating multiplicity of infection using parasite deep sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- A Large Plasmodium vivax Reservoir and Little Population Structure in the South Pacific.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People living in endemic areas often habour several malaria infections at once. High-resolution genotyping can distinguish between infections by detecting the presence of different alleles at a polymorphic locus. However the number of infections may not be accurately counted since parasites from multiple infections may carry the same allele. We use simulation to determine the circumstances under which the number of observed genotypes are likely to be substantially less than the number of infections present and investigate the performance of two methods for estimating the numbers of infections from high-resolution genotyping data. The simulations suggest that the problem is not substantial in most datasets: the disparity between the mean numbers of infections and of observed genotypes was small when there was 20 or more alleles, 20 or more blood samples, a mean number of infections of 6 or less and where the frequency of the most common allele was no greater than 20%. The issue of multiple infections carrying the same allele is unlikely to be a major component of the errors in PCR-based genotyping. Simulations also showed that, with heterogeneity in allele frequencies, the observed frequencies are not a good approximation of the true allele frequencies. The first method that we proposed to estimate the numbers of infections assumes that they are a good approximation and hence did poorly in the presence of heterogeneity. In contrast, the second method by Li et al estimates both the numbers of infections and the true allele frequencies simultaneously and produced accurate estimates of the mean number of infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.