Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952471›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2012

Development of a scheme and tools to construct a standard moth brain for neural network simulations.

Hidetoshi Ikeno, Tomoki Kazawa, Shigehiro Namiki, Daisuke Miyamoto, Yohei Sato, Stephan Shuichi Haupt, Ikuko Nishikawa, Ryohei Kanzaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insect-machine hybrid system for understanding and evaluating sensory-motor control by sex pheromone in Bombyx mori.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hidetoshi IkenoSchool of Human Science and Environment, University of Hyogo, 1-1-12 Shinzaike-Honcho, Himeji, Hyogo 670-0092, Japan. ikeno@shse.u-hyogo.ac.jp
Tomoki Kazawa
Shigehiro Namiki
Daisuke Miyamoto
Yohei Sato
Stephan Shuichi Haupt
Ikuko Nishikawa
Ryohei Kanzaki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neural mechanisms for sensing environmental information and controlling behavior in natural environments is a principal aim in neuroscience. One approach towards this goal is rebuilding neural systems by simulation. Despite their relatively simple brains compared with those of mammals, insects are capable of processing various sensory signals and generating adaptive behavior. Nevertheless, our global understanding at network system level is limited by experimental constraints. Simulations are very effective for investigating neural mechanisms when integrating both experimental data and hypotheses. However, it is still very difficult to construct a computational model at the whole brain level owing to the enormous number and complexity of the neurons. We focus on a unique behavior of the silkmoth to investigate neural mechanisms of sensory processing and behavioral control. Standard brains are used to consolidate experimental results and generate new insights through integration. In this study, we constructed a silkmoth standard brain and brain image, in which we registered segmented neuropil regions and neurons. Our original software tools for segmentation of neurons from confocal images, KNEWRiTE, and the registration module for segmented data, NeuroRegister, are shown to be very effective in neuronal registration for computational neuroscience studies.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainComputer SimulationMothsNeuronsNeuropilSoftware

Identifiers

PMID22952471
PMCPMC3431043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.