ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Improving image retrieval effectiveness via query expansion using MeSH hierarchical structure.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large scale biomedical texts classification: a kNN and an ESA-based approaches.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
- Trends in biomedical informatics: automated topic analysis of JAMIA articles.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Automatically finding relevant citations for clinical guideline development.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Biomedical imaging ontologies: A survey and proposal for future work.Journal of pathology informatics · 2015Article
- Biomarker identification using text mining.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2012Article
- Biomedical imaging informatics in the era of precision medicine: progress, challenges, and opportunities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe explored two strategies for query expansion utilizing medical subject headings (MeSH) ontology to improve the effectiveness of medical image retrieval systems. In order to achieve greater effectiveness in the expansion, the search text was analyzed to identify which terms were most amenable to being expanded.
designTo perform the expansions we utilized the hierarchical structure by which the MeSH descriptors are organized. Two strategies for selecting the terms to be expanded in each query were studied. The first consisted of identifying the medical concepts using the unified medical language system metathesaurus. In the second strategy the text of the query was divided into n-grams, resulting in sequences corresponding to MeSH descriptors. MEASUREMENTS: For the evaluation of the system, we used the collection made available by the ImageCLEF organization in its 2011 medical image retrieval task. The main measure of efficiency employed for evaluating the techniques developed was the mean average precision (MAP).
resultsBoth strategies exceeded the average MAP score in the ImageCLEF 2011 competition (0.1644). The n-gram expansion strategy achieved a MAP of 0.2004, which represents an improvement of 21.89% over the average MAP score in the competition. On the other hand, the medical concepts expansion strategy scored 0.2172 in the MAP, representing a 32.11% improvement. This run won the text-based medical image retrieval task in 2011.
conclusionsQuery expansion exploiting the hierarchical structure of the MeSH descriptors achieved a significant improvement in image retrieval systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.