Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952223›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

Hallmarks of processivity in glycoside hydrolases from crystallographic and computational studies of the Serratia marcescens chitinases.

Christina M Payne, Jamil Baban, Svein J Horn, Paul H Backe, Andrew S Arvai, Bjørn Dalhus, Magnar Bjørås, Vincent G H Eijsink, Morten Sørlie, Gregg T Beckham and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plasmodium chitinases: revisiting a target of transmission-blockade against malaria.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ega3 from the fungal pathogenThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular mechanism ofThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A novel thermostable chitinolytic machinery ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina M PayneBiosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden Colorado 80401, USA.
Jamil Baban
Svein J Horn
Paul H Backe
Andrew S Arvai
Bjørn Dalhus
Magnar Bjørås
Vincent G H Eijsink
Morten Sørlie
Gregg T Beckham
Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOOslo University Hospital · NOScripps Research Institute · USNational Laboratory of the Rockies · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides in nature is typically accomplished by mixtures of processive and nonprocessive glycoside hydrolases (GHs), which exhibit synergistic activity wherein nonprocessive enzymes provide new sites for productive attachment of processive enzymes. GH processivity is typically attributed to active site geometry, but previous work has demonstrated that processivity can be tuned by point mutations or removal of single loops. To gain additional insights into the differences between processive and nonprocessive enzymes that give rise to their synergistic activities, this study reports the crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the GH family 18 nonprocessive endochitinase, ChiC, from Serratia marcescens. This completes the structural characterization of the co-evolved chitinolytic enzymes from this bacterium and enables structural analysis of their complementary functions. The ChiC catalytic module reveals a shallow substrate-binding cleft that lacks aromatic residues vital for processivity, a calcium-binding site not previously seen in GH18 chitinases, and, importantly, a displaced catalytic acid (Glu-141), suggesting flexibility in the catalytic center. Molecular dynamics simulations of two processive chitinases (ChiA and ChiB), the ChiC catalytic module, and an endochitinase from Lactococcus lactis show that the nonprocessive enzymes have more flexible catalytic machineries and that their bound ligands are more solvated and flexible. These three features, which relate to the more dynamic on-off ligand binding processes associated with nonprocessive action, correlate to experimentally measured differences in processivity of the S. marcescens chitinases. These newly defined hallmarks thus appear to be key dynamic metrics in determining processivity in GH enzymes complementing structural insights.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationBacterial ProteinsCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayGlycoside HydrolasesSerratia marcescensStructure-Activity RelationshipBacterial ProteinsGlycoside Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID22952223
PMCPMC3476299
OpenAlexW1989639319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.