Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952016›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Quantitative measurement of invadopodia-mediated extracellular matrix proteolysis in single and multicellular contexts.

Karen H Martin, Karen E Hayes, Elyse L Walk, Amanda Gatesman Ammer, Steven M Markwell, Scott A Weed

Open access · hybridAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen H MartinDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Program in Cancer Cell Biology, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, USA.
Karen E Hayes
Elyse L Walk
Amanda Gatesman Ammer
Steven M Markwell
Scott A Weed
West Virginia University · US

Funding

THE ROLE OF HEF1 PROTEIN IN INVASION OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCERP20RR016440 · NCRR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI CUFF, CHRISTOPHER F · 2001 to 2010
$22.8M
West Virginia Flow Cytometry Core FacilityP30GM103488 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI CUFF, CHRISTOPHER F · 2012 to 2016
$4.8M
COBRE FOR SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND CANCER PHASE IIIP30RR032138 · NCRR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI GIBSON, LAURA F. · 2011 to 2011
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016440NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16440NCRR NIH HHS P30 RR032138NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular invasion into local tissues is a process important in development and homeostasis. Malregulated invasion and subsequent cell movement is characteristic of multiple pathological processes, including inflammation, cardiovascular disease and tumor cell metastasis. Focalized proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components in the epithelial or endothelial basement membrane is a critical step in initiating cellular invasion. In tumor cells, extensive in vitro analysis has determined that ECM degradation is accomplished by ventral actin-rich membrane protrusive structures termed invadopodia. Invadopodia form in close apposition to the ECM, where they moderate ECM breakdown through the action of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The ability of tumor cells to form invadopodia directly correlates with the ability to invade into local stroma and associated vascular components. Visualization of invadopodia-mediated ECM degradation of cells by fluorescent microscopy using dye-labeled matrix proteins coated onto glass coverslips has emerged as the most prevalent technique for evaluating the degree of matrix proteolysis and cellular invasive potential. Here we describe a version of the standard method for generating fluorescently-labeled glass coverslips utilizing a commercially available Oregon Green-488 gelatin conjugate. This method is easily scaled to rapidly produce large numbers of coated coverslips. We show some of the common microscopic artifacts that are often encountered during this procedure and how these can be avoided. Finally, we describe standardized methods using readily available computer software to allow quantification of labeled gelatin matrix degradation mediated by individual cells and by entire cellular populations. The described procedures provide the ability to accurately and reproducibly monitor invadopodia activity, and can also serve as a platform for evaluating the efficacy of modulating protein expression or testing of anti-invasive compounds on extracellular matrix degradation in single and multicellular settings.

Indexed as

Carboxylic AcidsCell Surface ExtensionsExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix ProteinsMatrix MetalloproteinasesMicroscopy, FluorescenceProteolysisCarboxylic AcidsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsMatrix MetalloproteinasesOregon Green 488 carboxylic acid

Identifiers

PMID22952016
PMCPMC3606055
OpenAlexW2075569359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.