Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22951905›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2012

Phospho-ΔNp63α/SREBF1 protein interactions: bridging cell metabolism and cisplatin chemoresistance.

Yiping Huang, Lauren N Bell, Jun Okamura, Myoung Soo Kim, Robert P Mohney, Rafael Guerrero-Preston, Edward A Ratovitski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Novel Insights on Lipid Metabolism Alterations in Drug Resistance in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Targeting Cellular Metabolism Modulates Head and Neck Oncogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Emerging Roles of p53 Family Members in Glucose Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yiping HuangDepartment of Dermatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lauren N Bell
Jun Okamura
Myoung Soo Kim
Robert P Mohney
Rafael Guerrero-Preston
Edward A Ratovitski
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USMetabolon (United States) · USUniversity of Baltimore · US

Funding

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL MOLECULAR MARKERSU01CA084986 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 1999 to 2014
$33.8M
Epigenomic Markers of HNSCC Survival Across Ethnic GroupsK01CA164092 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GUERRERO-PRESTON, RAFAEL · 2011 to 2014
$530k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA164092NCI NIH HHS K01-CA164092NCI NIH HHS U01 CA084986NCI NIH HHS U01-CA84986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor protein (TP)-p53 family members (TP63, TP63 and TP73) are guardians of the genome and key players in orchestrating the cellular response to cisplatin treatment. Cisplatin-induced phosphorylation of ΔNp63α was shown to have a role in regulating intracellular ΔNp63α protein levels. We previously found that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells exposed to cisplatin displayed the ATM-dependent phosphorylation of ΔNp63α (p-ΔNp63α), which is critical for the transcriptional regulation of specific downstream mRNAs and microRNAs and is likely to underlie the chemoresistance of SCC cells. However, SCC cells expressing non-p-ΔNp63α became more cisplatin-resistant. We also found that p-ΔNp63α forms complexes with a number of proteins involved in cell death response through regulation of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, autophagy, RNA splicing and chromatin modifications. Here, we showed that p-ΔNp63α induced ARG1, GAPDH, and CPT2 gene transcription in cisplatin-sensitive SCC cells, while non-p-ΔNp63α increased a transcription of CAD, G6PD and FASN genes in cisplatin-resistant SCC cells. We report that the p-ΔNp63α-dependent regulatory mechanisms implicated in the modulation of plethora of pathways, including amino acid, carbohydrate, lipid and nucleotide metabolisms, thereby affect tumor cell response to cisplatin-induced cell death, suggesting that the ATM-dependent ΔNp63α pathway plays a role in the resistance of tumor cells to platinum therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCisplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, ReporterHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLuciferasesNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphorylationAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCisplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsLuciferasesNeoplasm ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSREBF1 protein, humanSterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1TP63 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22951905
PMCPMC3495824
OpenAlexW2014723193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.