Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22951634›Full record

SynthesisAIDS (London, England)2012

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy during and after pregnancy in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jean B Nachega, Olalekan A Uthman, Jean Anderson, Karl Peltzer, Sarah Wampold, Mark F Cotton, Edward J Mills, Yuh-Shan Ho, Jeffrey S A Stringer, James A McIntyre and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 315 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
315citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02459678 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

ART Readiness in HIV-infected Pregnant Women: From Formative Qualitative Research to Individual Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2015 to 2018Enrolled454ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency VirusArmsEnhanced Adherence Package, Standard of Care
NCT03200054 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Postpartum Adherence Clubs for Antiretroviral Therapy: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Cape TownRan2016 to 2020Enrolled412ConditionsHivArmsAdherence Clubs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

315 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-positive people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

255 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jean B NachegaDepartment of International Health, Global Disease Epidemiology and Control Program, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615N. Wolfe Street, Suite W5031, Baltimore,MD21205, USA. jnachega@jhsph.edu
Olalekan A Uthman
Jean Anderson
Karl Peltzer
Sarah Wampold
Mark F Cotton
Edward J Mills
Yuh-Shan Ho
Jeffrey S A Stringer
James A McIntyre
Lynne M Mofenson

Funding

DOT-HARRT for HIV-Infected South African AdultsK23AI068582 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NACHEGA, JEAN BISIMWA · 2006 to 2010
$652k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI068582NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI 068582-01NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI005535901NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH083592NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH083592-01A1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT087537MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence rates during pregnancy and postpartum in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, SCI Web of Science, NLM Gateway, and Google scholar databases were searched. We included all studies reporting adherence rates as a primary or secondary outcome among HIV-infected pregnant women. Two independent reviewers extracted data on adherence and study characteristics. A random-effects model was used to pool adherence rates; sensitivity, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed.

resultsOf 72 eligible articles, 51 studies involving 20 153 HIV-infected pregnant women were included. Most studies were from United States (n =  14, 27%) followed by Kenya (n = 6, 12%), South Africa (n = 5, 10%), and Zambia (n = 5, 10%). The threshold defining good adherence to ART varied across studies (>80, >90, >95, 100%). A pooled analysis of all studies indicated a pooled estimate of 73.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69.3-77.5%] of pregnant women who had adequate (>80%) ART adherence. The pooled proportion of women with adequate adherence levels was higher during the antepartum (75.7%, 95% CI 71.5-79.7%) than during postpartum (53.0%, 95% CI 32.8-72.7%; P = 0.005). Selected reported barriers for nonadherence included physical, economic and emotional stresses, depression (especially postdelivery), alcohol or drug use, and ART dosing frequency or pill burden.

conclusionOur findings indicate that only 73.5% of pregnant women achieved optimal ART adherence. Reaching adequate ART adherence levels was a challenge in pregnancy, but especially during the postpartum period. Further research to investigate specific barriers and interventions to address them is urgently needed globally.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAnti-HIV AgentsDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV SeropositivityHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalePostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSocial ClassUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22951634
PMCPMC5061936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.