Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22948390›Full record

Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2012

Do clinical guidelines improve management of sepsis in critically ill elderly patients? A before-and-after study of the implementation of a sepsis protocol.

Hans Juergen Heppner, Katrin Singler, Anja Kwetkat, Steffen Popp, Adelheid Susanne Esslinger, Philipp Bahrmann, Matthias Kaiser, Thomas Bertsch, Cornel Christian Sieber, Michael Christ

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [Recognition of infections in elderly emergency patients].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2015
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hans Juergen HeppnerDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Nuremberg, Prof.-E.-Nathan-Strasse 1, Nuremberg, Germany. heppner@klinikum-nuernberg.de
Katrin Singler
Anja Kwetkat
Steffen Popp
Adelheid Susanne Esslinger
Philipp Bahrmann
Matthias Kaiser
Thomas Bertsch
Cornel Christian Sieber
Michael Christ
Nuremberg Hospital · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEHochschule Aalen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimGuidelines for the management of sepsis have been published but not validated for elderly patients, though a prompt work-up and initiation of appropriate therapy are crucial. This study assesses the impact of a sepsis protocol on timelines for therapy and mortality in standardized management.

methodsConsecutive patients aged 70 years and older who were diagnosed with sepsis and admitted during the observation periods were included in this before-and-after study at a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Age, sex, and process-of-care variables including timely administration of antibiotics, obtaining blood cultures before the start of antibiotics, documenting central venous pressure, evaluation of central venous blood oxygen saturation, fluid resuscitation, and patient outcome were recorded.

resultsA total of 122 patients were included. Sepsis was diagnosed in 22.9 % of patients prior to the introduction of the protocol and 57.4 % after introduction. Volume therapy was conducted in 63.9 % of the patients (11.5 % preprotocol). Blood culture samples were taken prior to the administration of antibiotics in 67.2 % of patients (4.9 % preprotocol), and antibiotics were applied early in 72.1 % of patients (32.8 % preprotocol). Lactate was set in 77.0 % of patients (11.5 % preprotocol). A central venous catheter was inserted in 88.5 % of patients (68.9 % preprotocol), and the target central venous pressure was achieved in 64.3 % of patients (47.2 % preprotocol). ICU mortality was reduced by 5.2 % and hospital mortality by 6.4 %.

conclusionsThe use of standardized order sets for the management of sepsis in elderly patients should be strongly recommended for better performance in treatment. Compliance with the protocol was associated with reduced length of stay, reduced mortality, and improved initial appropriate therapy.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAgedCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSepsisSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22948390
OpenAlexW89872787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.