Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22948388›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2012

Control of arthritis pain with anti-nerve-growth factor: risk and benefit.

Matthias F Seidel, Nancy E Lane

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanisms that drive bone pain across the lifespan.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias F SeidelSection of Rheumatology, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, University Hospital, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. matthias.seidel@ukb.uni-bonn.de
Nancy E Lane
University Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthritis is characterized by pain and inflammation. Recently, attention has been focused on nerve-growth factor (NGF), a neurotrophin that is a key regulator of peripheral nociception because it mediates overexpression of proinflammatory neuron-derived molecules such as substance P, serotonin, and calcitonin gene-related peptide. Antibodies have been generated for NGF and its receptor that are effective in reducing pain in preclinical pain models, and clinical trials in patients with advanced knee and hip osteoarthritis and low-back pain. Results show pain reduction is rapid and sustained. Adverse events with anti-NGF included transient paraesthesia and edema, rapidly progressive OA, and, in a small number of patients treated with both anti-NGF and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, osteonecrosis. Inhibition of the NGF-stimulated nociceptive pathway seems to be effective; however, the adverse effects require further investigation.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArthritisHumansNerve Growth FactorNeurogenic InflammationNociceptive PainPainReceptors, Nerve Growth FactorAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedNerve Growth FactorReceptors, Nerve Growth Factortanezumab

Identifiers

PMID22948388
OpenAlexW2063676853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.