ArticleBiophysical journal2012
Comparison of fragments comprising the first two helices of the human Y4 and the yeast Ste2p G-protein-coupled receptors.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Paradigm for Peptide Hormone-GPCR Analyses.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Understanding GPCR Recognition and Folding from NMR Studies of Fragments.RSC advances · 2018Article
- NMR Investigation of Structures of G-protein Coupled Receptor Folding Intermediates.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Solution NMR techniques are used to determine the structure and the topology of micelle integration of a large fragment of the Y4 receptor, a human G-protein-coupled receptor, that contains the entire N-terminal domain plus the first two transmembrane (TM) segments. The structure calculations reveal that the putative TM helices are indeed helical to a large extent, but that interruptions of secondary structure occur close to internal polar or charged residues. This view is supported by (15)N relaxation data, amide-water exchange rates, and attenuations from micelle-integrating spin labels. No contacts between different helices are observed. This is in contrast to a similar TM1-TM2 fragment from the yeast Ste2p receptor for which locations of the secondary and the tertiary structure agreed well with the predictions from a homology model. The difference in structure is discussed in terms of principal biophysical properties of residues within central regions of the putative TM helices. Overall, using the biophysical scale of Wimley and White the TM regions of Ste2p display much more favorable free energies for membrane integration. Accordingly, the full secondary structure and the tertiary structure in TM1-TM2 of the Y4 receptor is likely to be formed only when tertiary contacts with other TM segments are created during folding of the receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.