Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22947597›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2012

Effect of routine probiotic, Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938, use on rates of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with birthweight < 1000 grams: a sequential analysis.

Chelsea Hunter, Mary Ann V T Dimaguila, Peter Gal, John E Wimmer, James Laurence Ransom, Rita Q Carlos, McCrae Smith, Christie C Davanzo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A meta-analysis of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  12. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  20. Probiotics in Disease Prevention and Treatment.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea HunterWomen's Hospital of Greensboro, Cone Health, Greensboro, NC, USA. peter.gal@conehealth.com
Mary Ann V T Dimaguila
Peter Gal
John E Wimmer
James Laurence Ransom
Rita Q Carlos
McCrae Smith
Christie C Davanzo
Cone Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNecrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a disease in neonates, often resulting in death or serious medical or neurodevelopmental complications. The rate of NEC is highest in the smallest babies and many efforts have been tried to reduce the rate of NEC. In neonates born below 1500 grams, the rate of NEC has been significantly reduced with the use of various probiotics. This study examines the impact of routine use of a probiotic, Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (BioGaia®), on the rate of NEC in neonates at highest risk for developing NEC, those with birth weight ≤1000 grams.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing the rates of NEC in neonates with birth weight ≤ 1000 grams. The groups are separated into those neonates born from January 2004 to June 30, 2009, before introduction of L. reuteri , and neonates born July 2009 through April 2011 who received routine L. reuteri prophylaxis. The chart review study was approved by our institutional review board and exempted from informed consent.Neonates were excluded if they died or were transferred within the first week of life. The remainder were categorized as having no NEC, medical NEC, surgical NEC, or NEC associated death. Since no major changes occurred in our NICU practice in recent years, and the introduction of L. reuteri as routine prophylaxis was abrupt, we attributed the post-probiotic changes to the introduction of this new therapy. Rates of NEC were compared using Chi square analysis with Fisher exact t-test.

resultsMedical records for 311 neonates were reviewed, 232 before- and 79 after-introduction of L. reuteri prophylaxis. The incidence of NEC was significantly lower in the neonates who received L. reuteri (2 of 79 neonates [2.5%] versus 35 of 232 untreated neonates [15.1%]). Rates of late-onset gram-negative or fungal infections (22.8 versus 31%) were not statistically different between treated and untreated groups. No adverse events related to use of L reuteri were noted.

conclusionsProphylactic initiation of L. reuteri as a probiotic for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis resulted in a statistically significant benefit, with avoidance of 1 NEC case for every 8 patients given prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely Low Birth WeightLimosilactobacillus reuteriCohort StudiesEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMaleProbioticsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22947597
PMCPMC3472183
OpenAlexW2167826026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.