Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22947166›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2012

Evolutionary principles and synthetic biology: avoiding a molecular tragedy of the commons with an engineered phage.

Eric G Gladstone, Ian J Molineux, James J Bull

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Engineered Bacteriophage Therapeutics: Rationale, Challenges and Future.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Microbiome therapeutics - Advances and challenges.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2016
    Review
  11. Design and engineering of a transmissible antiviral defense.Journal of biological engineering · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric G GladstoneSection of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas, Austin, USA. bull@utexas.edu.
Ian J Molineux
James J Bull
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Experimental viral evolution at high mutation rateR01GM057756 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI BULL, JAMES J · 1998 to 2013
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled

backgroundIn prior work, adding a gene to phage T7 that degraded the host K1 capsule facilitated growth when plated on capsulated hosts. However, the transgenic protein (an endosialidase) is expressed as an exoenzyme, released from the cell at lysis but unattached to the phage particle. There is thus the possibility that the gene will be subject to a tragedy of the commons and be selected against, if the enzyme benefits other genomes.

resultsThis evolutionary perspective was supported in short term experiments. The genome carrying the endosialidase gene was favored on a capsulated host if grown in physical isolation of control genomes (lacking the gene) but was selected against otherwise.

conclusionsThese results challenge efforts to engineer phages with exoenzymes that degrade biofilm polymers. If biofilms do not facilitate spatially structured phage growth, the transgenic enzymes may be rapidly eliminated from the phage population after release in the environment, even if the transgene benefits overall phage growth on the biofilm.

Identifiers

PMID22947166
PMCPMC3564837
OpenAlexW2097432329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.