Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22946523›Full record

Trial reportPsychology and aging2013

Stress modulates reinforcement learning in younger and older adults.

Nichole R Lighthall, Marissa A Gorlick, Andrej Schoeke, Michael J Frank, Mara Mather

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology and aging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Updating Beliefs under Perceived Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Estrous cycle stage gates the effect of stress on reward learning.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aging, uncertainty, and decision making-A review.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nichole R LighthallDavis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, USA. nichole.lighthall@duke.edu
Marissa A Gorlick
Andrej Schoeke
Michael J Frank
Mara Mather

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN GERONTOLOGYT32AG000037 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, EILEEN M CRIMMINS · 1985 to 2026
$13.2M
The effects of stress on neural processing of reward and riskR01AG038043 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Brain Mechanisms of Emotion-Cognition Interactions in AgingK02AG032309 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2009 to 2013
$540k
The Effects of Stress on Reward Learning Among Younger and Older AdultsR21AG030758 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2007 to 2009
$459k
Effects of stress on motivated behavior: Age differences and neurophysiological mF31AG038137 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LIGHTHALL, NICHOLE · 2011 to 2012
$47k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG038137NIA NIH HHS F31AG038137NIA NIH HHS K02 AG032309NIA NIH HHS K02AG032309NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038043NIA NIH HHS R01AG038043NIA NIH HHS R21 AG030758NIA NIH HHS R21AG030758NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000037NIA NIH HHS T32AG000037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal research and human neuroimaging studies indicate that stress increases dopamine levels in brain regions involved in reward processing, and stress also appears to increase the attractiveness of addictive drugs. The current study tested the hypothesis that stress increases reward salience, leading to more effective learning about positive than negative outcomes in a probabilistic selection task. Changes to dopamine pathways with age raise the question of whether stress effects on incentive-based learning differ by age. Thus, the present study also examined whether effects of stress on reinforcement learning differed for younger (age 18-34) and older participants (age 65-85). Cold pressor stress was administered to half of the participants in each age group, and salivary cortisol levels were used to confirm biophysiological response to cold stress. After the manipulation, participants completed a probabilistic learning task involving positive and negative feedback. In both younger and older adults, stress enhanced learning about cues that predicted positive outcomes. In addition, during the initial learning phase, stress diminished sensitivity to recent feedback across age groups. These results indicate that stress affects reinforcement learning in both younger and older adults and suggests that stress exerts different effects on specific components of reinforcement learning depending on their neural underpinnings.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMaleNeuropsychological TestsRewardSalivaStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID22946523
PMCPMC3516629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.