ArticleUrological research2012
Effect of SWL on renal hemodynamics: could a change in renal artery contraction-relaxation responses be the cause?
Article in Urological research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Prospective Study of Renal Blood Flow during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of selected Doppler parameters of renal blood flow in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Central European journal of urology · 2017Article
- Wrong perspective obscures the adverse effects of shock-wave lithotripsy.Urolithiasis · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to reveal the effect of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on renal artery contraction-relaxation responses and the relation of this effect with renal hemodynamics. Twenty-four rabbits are divided into six different groups. The first two groups evaluated as the control groups. After isolating the kidneys, we applied phenylephrine (Ph) and acetylcholine (Ach) in the first group and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and histamine (H) in the second group. In the third, fourth, fifth and sixth groups, 14.5 kV shock wave (SW) was focused on the left kidneys. We adjusted the number of shocks to a total of 500, 1,500, and 3,000 SW, in the third, fourth and fifth groups, respectively. After isolating the kidneys, Ph, Ach was given in groups 3, 4 and 5. In the sixth group, to get the SNP and the H responses, 3,000 shocks modality was utilized. Marked contractile responses were obtained by phenylephrine in the control group. In kidneys that were exposed to 500 shocks SWL procedures, a decrease in contractile responses and hence, in perfusion pressures in different concentrations of phenylephrine was noted. However, a notable change in relaxation responses occurred after 3,000-shock applications. No difference in relaxation responses to nitroprusside, a direct vasodilating agent, was observed in any group, compared to the control group. Another cause of deterioration of renal hemodynamics after SWL can be attributed to the reduction in renal artery contraction-relaxation responses that result in the vascular smooth muscle and endothelial damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.