Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22945808›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2013

Division of labor during primary humoral immunity.

Cristina L Swanson, Roberta Pelanda, Raul M Torres

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Canonical NF-κB signaling is uniquely required for the long-term persistence of functional mature B cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mouse marginal zone B cells harbor specificities similar to human broadly neutralizing HIV antibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina L SwansonIntegrated Department of Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
Roberta Pelanda
Raul M Torres
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Chemokine response in B cell development and functionR01AI052157 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TORRES, RAUL MARTIN · 2002 to 2017
$5.4M
Tolerance in Polyclonal and Oligoclonal Immune SystemsR01AI052310 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PELANDA, ROBERTA · 2003 to 2017
$5.0M
Molecular Mechanisms of Immune ToleranceT32AI074491 · NIAID · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI CAMBIER, JOHN C, PELANDA, ROBERTA · 2009 to 2023
$4.1M
Marginal Zone B Cell Response to HIVR21AI078468 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TORRES, RAUL MARTIN · 2008 to 2009
$424k
Tolerance in Polyclonal and Oligoclonal Immune SystemsR56AI052310 · NIAID · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI PELANDA, ROBERTA · 2007 to 2007
$363k
NIAID NIH HHS AI052157NIAID NIH HHS AI052310NIAID NIH HHS AI074491NIAID NIH HHS AI078468NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052157NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052310NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI078468NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI052310NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B lymphocytes are often considered a homogenous population. However, B cells in both mouse and humans are comprised of distinct subpopulations that differ in development, phenotype, function, and microenvironmental niches. Much of our understanding about how these different B-cells populations mount antibody responses has been derived from experimental findings in mouse models and based on the use of model antigens. These reductionist studies performed over decades have been invaluable in defining the parameters of the B-cell antibody response to different types of antigens. However, these antigens also are now known to differ in a significant manner from bona fide physiological pathogens, and precisely how these different B-cell subsets divide labor in the primary humoral immune defense of pathogens is less well understood. While there are no absolutes in this area, there are recurring themes that divide the roles of B-cell subsets to different arms of the antibody response. This review provides an overview of rules that govern the B-cell labor roles, exceptions that break these rules, and models that have been used to define them.

Indexed as

Immunity, HumoralAnimalsAntibodiesAntigensB-LymphocytesHumansVaccinesAntibodiesAntigensVaccines

Identifiers

PMID22945808
PMCPMC3997297
OpenAlexW2048657632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.