ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2012
Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sexual selection and 'species recognition' revisited: serial processing and order-of-operations in mate choice.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- A small, computationally flexible network produces the phenotypic diversity of song recognition in crickets.eLife · 2021Article
- Online Detection of Multiple Stimulus Changes Based on Single Neuron Interspike Intervals.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015Review
- Time and timing in the acoustic recognition system of crickets.Frontiers in physiology · 2014Article
- Diversity of acoustic tracheal system and its role for directional hearing in crickets.Frontiers in zoology · 2013Article
- Computational principles underlying the recognition of acoustic signals in insects.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2013Article
- Selective phonotaxis to high sound-pulse rate in the cricket Gryllus assimilis.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acoustic display of many cricket species consists of trains of pulses (chirps) with intermittent pauses. Here, we investigated the temporal cues that females of the cricket Teleogryllus leo used to detect a pulse and a chirp pattern on two different time scales. For both patterns, females accepted a wide range of combinations that covered the respective pulse and chirp parameters in the songs of males. In tests with a continuous series of pulses at different modulation frequencies, the transfer function of pattern discrimination was also determined. Females exhibited two ranges of high response scores indicating two temporal filters with an inhibitory interaction. For the modulation frequency of the pulse pattern, the peak of the preference function was rather sharply tuned and at a lower pulse rate than produced by males. These results show that the combined output of both filters did not increase selectivity, but rather enlarged the accepted range of signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22945775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.