ArticleOncogene2013
Interactions between wild-type and mutant Ras genes in lung and skin carcinogenesis.
Article in Oncogene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting RAS family GTPase signaling: effector selectivity and oncogenic bypass.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- Pancreatic Cells Are Resistant to KRASQ61L Expression due to Hyperactive ERK/MAPK Signaling and Apoptosis Induction.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Wild-type RAS signaling is an essential therapeutic target inScience signaling · 2025Article
- The Role of RAS in CNS Tumors: A Key Player or an Overlooked Oncogene?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cooperative genomic lesions in HRAS-mutant cancers predict resistance to farnesyltransferase inhibitors.Oncogene · 2024Article
- MYC and KRAS cooperation: from historical challenges to therapeutic opportunities in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- KRAS allelic imbalance drives tumour initiation yet suppresses metastasis in colorectal cancer in vivo.Nature communications · 2024Article
- DAB2IP Is a Bifunctional Tumor Suppressor That Regulates Wild-Type RAS and Inflammatory Cascades in KRAS Mutant Colon Cancer.Cancer research · 2023Article
- The phospholipid transporter PITPNC1 links KRAS to MYC to prevent autophagy in lung and pancreatic cancer.Molecular cancer · 2023Article
- Mutational Damages in Malignant Lung Tumors.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Dynamic regulation of RAS and RAS signaling.The Biochemical journal · 2023Article
- RAS oncogene signal strength regulates matrisomal gene expression and tumorigenicity of mouse keratinocytes.Carcinogenesis · 2022Article
- Enhanced BRAF engagement by NRAS mutants capable of promoting melanoma initiation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Review
- Prognostic Significance of the Loss of Heterozygosity ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Loss of the wild-type KRAS allele promotes pancreatic cancer progression through functional activation of YAP1.Oncogene · 2021Article
- Metabonomics study of the effects of single copy mutant KRAS in the presence or absence of WT allele using human HCT116 isogenic cell lines.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2021Article
- Role of PLEXIND1/TGFβ Signaling Axis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression Correlates with the Mutational Status ofCancers · 2021Article
- Ras isoform-specific expression, chromatin accessibility, and signaling.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ras oncogenes (Hras, Kras and Nras) are important drivers of carcinogenesis. However, tumors with Ras mutations often show loss of the corresponding wild-type (WT) allele, suggesting that proto-oncogenic forms of Ras can function as a suppressor of carcinogenesis. In vitro studies also suggest that WT Ras proteins can suppress the tumorigenic properties of alternate mutant Ras family members, but in vivo evidence for these heterologous interactions is lacking. We have investigated the genetic interactions between different combinations of mutant and WT Ras alleles in vivo using carcinogen-induced lung and skin carcinogenesis in mice with targeted deletion of different Ras family members. The major suppressor effect of WT Kras is observed only in mutant Kras-driven lung carcinogenesis, where loss of one Kras allele led to increased tumor number and size. Deletion of one Hras allele dramatically reduced the number of skin papillomas with Hras mutations, consistent with Hras as the major target of mutation in these tumors. However, skin carcinoma numbers were very similar, suggesting that WT Hras functions as a suppressor of progression from papillomas to invasive squamous carcinomas. In the skin, the Kras proto-oncogene functions cooperatively with mutant Hras to promote papilloma development, although the effect is relatively small. In contrast, the Hras proto-oncogene attenuated the activity of mutant Kras in lung carcinogenesis. Interestingly, loss of Nras increased the number of mutant Kras-induced lung tumors, but decreased the number of mutant Hras-induced skin papillomas. These results show that the strongest suppressor effects of WT Ras are only seen in the context of mutation of the cognate Ras protein, and only relatively weak effects are detected on tumor development induced by mutations in alternative family members. The data also underscore the complex and context-dependent nature of interactions between proto-oncogenic and oncogenic forms of different Ras family members during tumor development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.