Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22945650›Full record

ArticleOncogene2013

Interactions between wild-type and mutant Ras genes in lung and skin carcinogenesis.

M D To, R D Rosario, P M K Westcott, K L Banta, A Balmain

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of RAS in CNS Tumors: A Key Player or an Overlooked Oncogene?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mutational Damages in Malignant Lung Tumors.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  11. Dynamic regulation of RAS and RAS signaling.The Biochemical journal · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M D ToThoracic Oncology Program, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
R D Rosario
P M K Westcott
K L Banta
A Balmain
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Identification of epithelial tumor susceptiility genesU01CA084244 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BALMAIN, ALLAN · 1999 to 2013
$13.3M
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND PHARMACOGENOMICST32GM007175 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AHITUV, NADAV, KROETZ, DEANNA L · 1985 to 2021
$7.1M
The role of the Kras4A isoform in epithelial carcinogenesisR01CA111834 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BALMAIN, ALLAN · 2006 to 2016
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA111834-01NCI NIH HHS CA84244NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111834NCI NIH HHS U01 CA084244NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ras oncogenes (Hras, Kras and Nras) are important drivers of carcinogenesis. However, tumors with Ras mutations often show loss of the corresponding wild-type (WT) allele, suggesting that proto-oncogenic forms of Ras can function as a suppressor of carcinogenesis. In vitro studies also suggest that WT Ras proteins can suppress the tumorigenic properties of alternate mutant Ras family members, but in vivo evidence for these heterologous interactions is lacking. We have investigated the genetic interactions between different combinations of mutant and WT Ras alleles in vivo using carcinogen-induced lung and skin carcinogenesis in mice with targeted deletion of different Ras family members. The major suppressor effect of WT Kras is observed only in mutant Kras-driven lung carcinogenesis, where loss of one Kras allele led to increased tumor number and size. Deletion of one Hras allele dramatically reduced the number of skin papillomas with Hras mutations, consistent with Hras as the major target of mutation in these tumors. However, skin carcinoma numbers were very similar, suggesting that WT Hras functions as a suppressor of progression from papillomas to invasive squamous carcinomas. In the skin, the Kras proto-oncogene functions cooperatively with mutant Hras to promote papilloma development, although the effect is relatively small. In contrast, the Hras proto-oncogene attenuated the activity of mutant Kras in lung carcinogenesis. Interestingly, loss of Nras increased the number of mutant Kras-induced lung tumors, but decreased the number of mutant Hras-induced skin papillomas. These results show that the strongest suppressor effects of WT Ras are only seen in the context of mutation of the cognate Ras protein, and only relatively weak effects are detected on tumor development induced by mutations in alternative family members. The data also underscore the complex and context-dependent nature of interactions between proto-oncogenic and oncogenic forms of different Ras family members during tumor development.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticMutation9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthraceneAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticFemaleGenes, rasLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiceMice, KnockoutModels, Geneticras ProteinsSkinSkin Neoplasms9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthraceneras ProteinsUrethane

Identifiers

PMID22945650
PMCPMC3515692
OpenAlexW1965084174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.