ArticlePhysiological measurement2012
Linear and nonlinear measures of fetal heart rate patterns evaluated on very short fetal magnetocardiograms.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-linear Methods Predominant in Fetal Heart Rate Analysis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A Comprehensive Review of Techniques for Processing and Analyzing Fetal Heart Rate Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Complexity of Cardiotocographic Signals as A Predictor of Labor.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Developmental milestones of the autonomic nervous system revealed via longitudinal monitoring of fetal heart rate variability.PloS one · 2018Observational
- A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Article
- Segmented independent component analysis for improved separation of fetal cardiac signals from nonstationary fetal magnetocardiograms.Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering · 2015Article
- Differences in the sleep states of IUGR and low-risk fetuses: An MCG study.Early human development · 2013Article
- Effects of fetal respiratory movements on the short-term fractal properties of heart rate variability.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We analyzed the effectiveness of linear short- and long-term variability time domain parameters, an index of sympatho-vagal balance (SDNN/RMSSD) and entropy in differentiating fetal heart rate patterns (fHRPs) on the fetal heart rate (fHR) series of 5, 3 and 2 min duration reconstructed from 46 fetal magnetocardiograms. Gestational age (GA) varied from 21 to 38 weeks. FHRPs were classified based on the fHR standard deviation. In sleep states, we observed that vagal influence increased with GA, and entropy significantly increased (decreased) with GA (SDNN/RMSSD), demonstrating that a prevalence of vagal activity with autonomous nervous system maturation may be associated with increased sleep state complexity. In active wakefulness, we observed a significant negative (positive) correlation of short-term (long-term) variability parameters with SDNN/RMSSD. ANOVA statistics demonstrated that long-term irregularity and standard deviation of normal-to-normal beat intervals (SDNN) best differentiated among fHRPs. Our results confirm that short- and long-term variability parameters are useful to differentiate between quiet and active states, and that entropy improves the characterization of sleep states. All measures differentiated fHRPs more effectively on very short HR series, as a result of the fMCG high temporal resolution and of the intrinsic timescales of the events that originate the different fHRPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.